Purpose
We previously proposed an oxidative balance score (OBS) that combines pro- and anti-oxidant exposures to represent the overall oxidative balance status of an individual. In this study, we investigated associations of the OBS with all-cause and cause-specific mortality, and explored alternative OBS weighting methods in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study cohort.
Methods
The OBS was calculated by combining information from 14 a priori selected pro- and anti-oxidant factors, and then divided into quartiles with the lowest quartile (predominance of pro-oxidants) as reference. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each OBS category compared to the reference.
Results
Over a median 5.8 years of follow-up, 2,079 of the 21,031 participants died. The multivariable adjusted HRs (95% CI) for all-cause, cancer, and non-cancer mortality for those in the highest vs. the lowest equal-weighting OBS quartile were: 0.70 (0.61, 0.81), 0.50 (0.37, 0.67), and 0.77 (0.66, 0.89), respectively (P-trend < 0.01 for all). Similar results were observed with all weighting methods.
Conclusion
These results suggest that individuals with a greater balance of anti-oxidant to pro-oxidant lifestyle exposures may have lower mortality.