2008
DOI: 10.2175/106143007x221067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidation of Industrial Dyeing Wastewater by Supercritical Water Oxidation in Transpiring‐Wall Reactor

Abstract: Industrial dyeing wastewater was oxidized in supercritical water in a transpiring-wall reactor, using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant. Experiments were performed at 595 to 704 K and 18 to 30 MPa, with an oxidant dosage ratio ranging from 0.6 to 2.0. A chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal of more than 98.4% was achieved at 704 K and 28 MPa, with a retention time less than 35 seconds, which increased with the temperature, pressure, and oxidant. A modified first-order rate expression was regressed from experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that reaction temperature and OC have mainly positive influences on X COD. This phenomenon is in accordance with many previous reports concerning SCWO processes of different waste such as omethoate [17] and methaminophos [18], medical wastewater [28], industrial dyeing wastewater [31]. It is also verified that reaction temperature and OC are the main operation parameters affecting TOC…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems that reaction temperature and OC have mainly positive influences on X COD. This phenomenon is in accordance with many previous reports concerning SCWO processes of different waste such as omethoate [17] and methaminophos [18], medical wastewater [28], industrial dyeing wastewater [31]. It is also verified that reaction temperature and OC are the main operation parameters affecting TOC…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The former transforms organic matters in the wastewater into smaller gaseous hydrocarbons [32]. Gong et al [31] found that CO 2 , CO and N 2 were the main gaseous products. N, introduced from the waste or air, is transformed into N 2 or N 2 O, whereas N 2 O can be catalytically converted to N 2 [43].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we mainly investigated the effects of temperature and OR on pollutant removal. This was mainly based on the following considerations: For the pressure, many related studies reported that the effects of pressure on pollutant removal are minimal at the pressure range of 23–30 MPa. ,, In the following study, the pressure was kept at 25 MPa. For the reaction time, because the experiments were performed in a batch reactor, the reaction time at the desired temperature and pressures was not easy to control accurately at several seconds compared with the continuous operation adopted in industry. , We did not study the effects of reaction time on pollutant removal in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not propitious to the oxidation of LCWG in supercritical water. On the other hand, the rate constant of oxidation reaction increased with the increasing pressure [9]. This is in favor of removing pollutants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%