2011
DOI: 10.1038/nn.2872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Owl's behavior and neural representation predicted by Bayesian inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
232
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(68 reference statements)
28
232
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such effects are relatively common in human vision, where priors have been characterized on orientation (45), speed (46), and contour shape (47). Similar approaches have recently proved fruitful in audition (48)(49)(50). The significance of the reverberation regularities we observed, along with their influence on perception, is that they suggest reverberation should be viewed as a scene analysis problem, comparable to the better-known cocktail party problem, rather than simply a source of distortion or noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Such effects are relatively common in human vision, where priors have been characterized on orientation (45), speed (46), and contour shape (47). Similar approaches have recently proved fruitful in audition (48)(49)(50). The significance of the reverberation regularities we observed, along with their influence on perception, is that they suggest reverberation should be viewed as a scene analysis problem, comparable to the better-known cocktail party problem, rather than simply a source of distortion or noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Alternatively, it has been proposed that prior expectation might be encoded implicitly within the channel structure itself rather than through an explicit decoding stage (Fischer & Pena, 2011;Ganguli & Simoncelli, 2014). Take, for example, the perception of gaze direction, where there is a prior towards perceiving direct gaze (Mareschal et al, 2013b(Mareschal et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Structure Of the Representational Space For Person Perceptiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While adaptation is generally considered to uncover the structure of the encoded representation of the stimulus dimensions under investigation, the Bayesian approach could be measuring either an expectation that is encoded within the channel structure (Fischer & Pena, 2011;Ganguli & Simoncelli, 2014) or one that becomes apparent not at the encoding but at a decoding stage (Zemel et al, 1998). A full investigation of the form of any biases measured should uncover more about the relationship between the underlying representation proposed via adaptation and that proposed by a Bayesian approach.…”
Section: Structure Of the Representational Space For Person Perceptiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this idea, the sensorimotor response is optimized to reduce overall endpoint variability (i.e., maximize precision) and mean localization error (maximizing accuracy), by accounting for the inherent noise in the neural processing pathways, uncertainty about the stimulus environment, and by using prior (learned, expected) information about potential target locations (Kording and Wolpert 2006;Fischer and Pena 2011). Since the spectral elevation cues are more complex than the robust binaural difference cues, and hence their processing more vulnerable to perturbation by noise, sensory uncertainty about elevation may be considered larger than for azimuth.…”
Section: Elevation Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%