2009
DOI: 10.1080/10884600802693231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of Issues Related to Coercion in Substance Abuse Treatment: Part I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although prior research documents the utility of external pressure for increasing treatment retention (Darbo, 2009; Fagan, 1999; Mueller & Wyman, 1997; Sindelar & Fiellin, 2001), extrinsic motivation alone is insufficient to facilitate long-term results. Intrinsic motivation is key to engagement and personal recovery, yet it is often lower among individuals mandated to treatment (Broome et al, 2001; Joe et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although prior research documents the utility of external pressure for increasing treatment retention (Darbo, 2009; Fagan, 1999; Mueller & Wyman, 1997; Sindelar & Fiellin, 2001), extrinsic motivation alone is insufficient to facilitate long-term results. Intrinsic motivation is key to engagement and personal recovery, yet it is often lower among individuals mandated to treatment (Broome et al, 2001; Joe et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower personal motivation for change is associated with lower therapeutic engagement (Joe et al, 2014) and is a barrier to desirable treatment outcomes (Curry et al, 1991; Deci & Ryan, 1985; DiClemente et al, 1999). Research shows that while external pressures may provide the impetus for entering and staying in treatment for justice-involved youth (Darbo, 2009; Joe et al, 2014), it is internal motivation for change that is most closely associated with during-treatment markers of recovery and sustained change (Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 1999; Diamond et al, 2006; DiClemente & Scott, 1997; Garner et al, 2008; Garnick et al, 2012; Hiller et al, 2002; Joe et al, 2014; Joe et al, 1998; Rogers et al, 2008; Tetzlaff et al, 2005). Thus, juvenile justice–involved youth are at greater risk of experiencing poor treatment outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradox that Anna is granted autonomy to abort the foetus but not regarded as able to protect it will be further discussed later. The point here is that the process by which one is admitted to treatment and the style of confrontation or intervention can help or hinder treatment effectiveness (Darbro 2009).…”
Section: The Incompetence Of the Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, pressure from the legal system to enter treatment in order to avoid incarceration does not necessarily diminish motivation to attend or be successful in treatment (Prendergast, Greenwell, Farabee, Farabee, & Yih-Ing, 2009). In fact, although the criminal justice population is often reluctant to enter treatment despite the obvious need (Darbro, 2009), legally mandated treatment has been shown to increase retention rates (Perron & Bright, 2008) and can be just as successful as self-referred treatment (Snyder & Anderson, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%