Overview of issues affecting the demand for dry and wet/dry cooling for thermal power plants

Hendrickson, P.L.

doi:10.2172/6593517

Cited by 3 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Farmers in this country pay between $5 and $150 per acre-ft for irrigation water, but their costs are usually well below $20 per acre-ft (Hendrickson 1978). Even with subsidized water, many farmers are finding it difficult to make a profit.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This source could be attractive for water uses which do not require high water quality such as power plant cooling, or slurry pipelines. The cost of treating and transporting waste water 25 miles in California has been estimated to be about $360 per acre-ft (1977 dollars;Hendrickson 1978). However, this source is only viable for energy developments located near large metropolitan areas.…”

Section: Recycling Wastewatermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In some areas, it may be possible to divert substantial amounts of water from the agricultural sector to the industrial sector, without reducing irrigated acreage, by improving irrigation efficiency. For example, where flood irrigation can be replaced with sprinkler application, as much as one-third of the water previously required could be diverted to energy development (Hendrickson 1978).…”

Section: Irrigationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Water effects of the use of western coal for electrical production

Rogers¹

1980

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Recycling Wastewatermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Irrigationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Water effects of the use of western coal for electrical production

Rogers¹

1980

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Western states recognize both economic and honeconomic (e.g. aesthetic, recreational, environmental) meaures for beneficial use (Riggs, 1975;Burness and Quirk, 1976;Hendrickson, 1978). In addition, many western states consider some uses to have 'superior benefits' to others and will not allow the transfer of water from a superior use to an inferior use.…”

Section: Institutional Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the western coal-bearing states irrigation accounts for approximately 90% of the annual man-induced water consumption (WRC, Part V, 1978). Additional uses for water are domestic water supply, recreation and wildlife protection, and mining (Hendrickson, 1978;Dewsnup and Jensen, 1977).…”

Section: Seasonal Demand Patternsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Methodology for assessing alternative water-acquisition-and-use strategies for energy facilities in the American West

Shaw¹,

Adams²,

Harleman³

et al. 1981

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report develops a method for assessing alternative strategies for acquiring and using water at western energy plants. The method has been tested in a case study of cooling water use for a hypothetical steam electric power plant on the Crazy Woman Creek, an unregulated stream in Wyoming.The results from the case study suggest a careful analysis of reservoir design and water right purchase strategies can reduce the cost of acquiring and using water at an energy facility. The key to this advance arises because water is not a homogeneous good: different sources will deliver water with different costs and different reliabilities. This occurs because water supplies are sensitive to seasonal changes. The methodology recognizes this seasonal component in supply and searches for optimal (or 'non-inferior') tradeoffs between conserving water in the plant cooling system, building larger reservoirs, and purchasing existing water rights.The method uses simulation models to assess the capital and operating costs and expected monthly water consumption rates for different cooling system designs. The method also uses reservoir operating algorithms to select, for a fixed cooling system design, the optimal tradeoff between building a make-up water reservoir and purchasing water rights. These tradeoffs can be used to derive the firm's true demand curve for different sources of water. The analysis also reveals the implicit cost of selecting strategies which minimize conflicts with other water users.Three noteworthy findings are revealed for the single case study, though it appears these findings will hold for other small, unregulated rivers where some fraction of the flow remains unappropriated by existing users:1. Cooling ponds are as good as or preferred to wet towers because their costs already include provisions for storing water for use during the normally dry summer months and during occasional drought years.2. The energy firm's demand for overall water consumption in the cooling system is inversely proportional to both the cost of installing make-up water reservoirs, and the size of the energy facility.3. The firm's willingness to pay for existing rights is proportional to both the cost of installing reservoirs, and the size of the energy facility.Taken together, these last two findings suggest an energy firm's demand for water in general and its demand for existing water rights in particular can move in opposite directions. Contrary to recommendations seen elsewhere in the literature (Bishop and Naryanan, 1978), it does not necessarily follow that water should be transferred away from alternative uses to energy simply because energy firms can pay premium prices for the total water their plants consume. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

show abstract