2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of high-temperature batteries for geothermal and oil/gas borehole power sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing our best data with those reported by Guidotti et al, the capacity values that we obtained at C/12 and C/6 were higher [41] In both cases carbon MCMB and the same cycling procedure were used but with 15 wt% of PVDF as a binder [41] At C/12 capacities obtained were 325 mAh g −1 and 375 mAh g −1 , while at C/6 they were 300 mAh g −1 and 325 mAh g −1 , as observed by Guidotti et al and in this study, respectively. However at higher C-rates, the capacity values obtained in our study with XG were slightly lower than what was obtained by their study.…”
Section: Battery Cyclingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…When comparing our best data with those reported by Guidotti et al, the capacity values that we obtained at C/12 and C/6 were higher [41] In both cases carbon MCMB and the same cycling procedure were used but with 15 wt% of PVDF as a binder [41] At C/12 capacities obtained were 325 mAh g −1 and 375 mAh g −1 , while at C/6 they were 300 mAh g −1 and 325 mAh g −1 , as observed by Guidotti et al and in this study, respectively. However at higher C-rates, the capacity values obtained in our study with XG were slightly lower than what was obtained by their study.…”
Section: Battery Cyclingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Discharge performances were evaluated on an electrochemical test system (LAND, CT2001B-A2). The cells were discharged using the constant current test at 0.5 and 2.0 A, respectively, with sampling intervals of 100 ms to the cutoff voltage of 1.5 V [28].…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the voltage range from OCV 2.58 V to 1.25 V, the CoNi 2 S 4 has an overall capacity of 318 mA h g −1 which is comparable to that of the well-known metal disulfides FeS 2 , CoS 2 and NiS 2 (390, 414 and 413 mA h g −1 , respectively) as shown in Table III. 6,19,[20][21][22][23] The advantage of CoNi 2 S 4 is that this capacity comes from one 'single' discharge process compared to that of MS 2 (M = Fe, Co, Ni) which exhibit 'two' discharge processes. The discharge voltage of CoNi 2 S 4 decreases gradually from 1.60 V to 1.25 V, unlike in the case of the FeS 2 , CoS 2 and NiS 2 which exhibit sharper fall-off in voltage in this region.…”
Section: Electrochemical Investigation Of Coni 2 S 4 At 500mentioning
confidence: 99%