2020
DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.18.10312-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of evidence on emergency carotid stenting in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 The existence of community equipoise is also echoed in several studies that were all observational and often only described stented patients. Four main meta-analyses of these smaller case series have been published, 20,25,26,59 most with relatively few patients not having undergone acute stent placement and only 1 59 focusing primarily on whether acute stent placement was associated with different clinical outcomes than no stent placement. The large multicenter retrospective cases-series of 482 patients from the TITAN group was not included in these metaanalyses but suggests that stented patients receiving acute antiplatelet medications have more favorable outcomes than patients treated with angioplasty alone or those with no acute ICA intervention.…”
Section: Aq: Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The existence of community equipoise is also echoed in several studies that were all observational and often only described stented patients. Four main meta-analyses of these smaller case series have been published, 20,25,26,59 most with relatively few patients not having undergone acute stent placement and only 1 59 focusing primarily on whether acute stent placement was associated with different clinical outcomes than no stent placement. The large multicenter retrospective cases-series of 482 patients from the TITAN group was not included in these metaanalyses but suggests that stented patients receiving acute antiplatelet medications have more favorable outcomes than patients treated with angioplasty alone or those with no acute ICA intervention.…”
Section: Aq: Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analyses of the previous observational studies comparing different treatment strategies reported conflicting results, while one meta-analysis reported better outcome with cervical ICA stenting, 5 one reported no difference in functional outcome, 6 and another reported a higher complication rate and longer procedure time with cervical ICA stenting. 7 Based on the available evidence, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association considered the treatment of cervical ICA during EVT as reasonable (level IIb evidence). 8 The lack of randomized trials and the conflicting results from the observational studies created a state of uncertainty that was highlighted in a recent international survey regarding acute treatment options of tandem occlusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent meta-analyses did not find significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients treated with stenting and patients treated with PTA alone in the acute phase ( 12 , 13 ). Wilson et al concluded that most studies “have entirely or partly treated extracranial occlusion with stenting during initial treatment” and that very few focus on angioplasty-only approaches ( 12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%