2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:hydr.0000025255.70009.a5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
180
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 400 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
180
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A set of tolerance and diversity metrics commonly used in European permanent streams (AQEM consortium, 2002;Hering et al, 2004), and a multimetric index recently developed for southern Portugal (Pinto et al 2003), were tested from late winter to autumn, at two sites with contrasting ecological status (impaired and non-impaired). The influence of environmental variables on the metrics and the multimetric index was investigated and the stability of metric scores, observed over the whole sampling period (covering different hydrological situations), was used as a criterion to evaluate the robustness of the assessment of temporary streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of tolerance and diversity metrics commonly used in European permanent streams (AQEM consortium, 2002;Hering et al, 2004), and a multimetric index recently developed for southern Portugal (Pinto et al 2003), were tested from late winter to autumn, at two sites with contrasting ecological status (impaired and non-impaired). The influence of environmental variables on the metrics and the multimetric index was investigated and the stability of metric scores, observed over the whole sampling period (covering different hydrological situations), was used as a criterion to evaluate the robustness of the assessment of temporary streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, both the AQEM and the STAR project used a standardised protocol for sampling, sorting and identification of samples (Hering et al, 2004;Furse et al, 2006) the analyses of the composition of the data used in this study showed a wide spread in number of samples, number of taxa, number of specimens, and taxonomic level achieved through identification amongst participating countries. already listed some arguments that could explain these differences: differences in taxonomic knowledge, differences in natural population densities, changes of taxon diversity along geographical and altitudinal gradients, and local environmental differences that affected sampling efficiency or forced changes to the protocol.…”
Section: Data Compositionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The first touches the multimetrics approach in its fundament. In Europe, at the moment there is a very strong tendency to use multimetrics in assessment (Hering et al, 2004). The AQEM research project tested over one hundred metrics and came up with a list of 18 suitable core metrics (Hering et al, 2004).…”
Section: Taxonomic Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bridge, bank saving pitching) near them. The sampling was carried out according to the AQEM protocol, thus a sample consisted of 20 sampling units taken from all habitat types according to their share (Hering et al 2004). The proportions of the different habitat types were mapped at the sampling site and types of less than 5% coverage were not included in the sampling.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%