New Directions for Law in Australia 2017
DOI: 10.22459/ndla.09.2017.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overturning Aqua Nullius: Pathways to National Law Reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we learn about this history, we discover that like terra nullius, aqua nullius is a furphy (Marshall 2017). Most of the history we were taught in Australian schools was a result of colonial power and narratives that maintained their legitimacy.…”
Section: Acknowledgment Of Countrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we learn about this history, we discover that like terra nullius, aqua nullius is a furphy (Marshall 2017). Most of the history we were taught in Australian schools was a result of colonial power and narratives that maintained their legitimacy.…”
Section: Acknowledgment Of Countrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ocean has long been construed as an empty vessel - aqua-nullius - an inert medium to be traversed and controlled en route to the colonial present (Deloughrey, 2007, 2010, Marshall, 2017). Ocean spaces are often imagined as inert realms to be colonized by capital and exit elites (Craib, 2022), juridically defined to facilitate natural resource exploitation (Ranganathan, 2019), or - like Comoros, St Kitts, and Antigua - readily transformable into realms where citizenship can simply be purchased by the highest bidder (Abrahamian 2015).…”
Section: Urban Oceansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While at first glance it may seem that LP for natural sites/systems is compatible with the cosmologies, epistemologies and ontologies of Indigenous peoples, it may also be seen as yet another colonial imposition that erases the traditional relationships, conceptions, experiences and law of these sites (Marshall, 2017). According the Reef rights as a ‘natural object’ involves the foundational move of seeing nature as separate from humans, before then allowing ‘it’ some human-like rights and appointing some humans to speak as its legal proxy, thus supplanting Indigenous groups’ own diverse ‘conceptions of responsibility, agency and value’ (Whyte, 2017b: 89).…”
Section: Merits and Problems Of The Lp Approach In The Case Of The Gbrmentioning
confidence: 99%