Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundHealth systems are currently subject to unprecedented financial strains. Inappropriate test use wastes finite health resources (overuse) and delays diagnoses and treatment (underuse). As most patient care is provided in primary care, it represents an ideal setting to mitigate waste.ObjectiveTo identify overuse and underuse of diagnostic tests in primary care.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources and eligibility criteriaWe searched MEDLINE and Embase from January 1999 to October 2017 for studies that measured the inappropriateness of any diagnostic test (measured against a national or international guideline) ordered for adult patients in primary care.ResultsWe included 357 171 patients from 63 studies in 15 countries. We extracted 103 measures of inappropriateness (41 underuse and 62 overuse) from included studies for 47 different diagnostic tests.The overall rate of inappropriate diagnostic test ordering varied substantially (0.2%–100%)%).17 tests were underused >50% of the time. Of these, echocardiography (n=4 measures) was consistently underused (between 54% and 89%, n=4). There was large variation in the rate of inappropriate underuse of pulmonary function tests (38%–78%, n=8).Eleven tests were inappropriately overused >50% of the time. Echocardiography was consistently overused (77%–92%), whereas inappropriate overuse of urinary cultures, upper endoscopy and colonoscopy varied widely, from 36% to 77% (n=3), 10%–54% (n=10) and 8%–52% (n=2), respectively.ConclusionsThere is marked variation in the appropriate use of diagnostic tests in primary care. Specifically, the use of echocardiography (both underuse and overuse) is consistently poor. There is substantial variation in the rate of inappropriate underuse of pulmonary function tests and the overuse of upper endoscopy, urinary cultures and colonoscopy.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016048832.

Direct access cancer testing in primary care: a systematic review of use and clinical outcomes

“…Guidelines, and their underpinning evidence, vary in quality and have been criticised for oversimplifying the complexity of primary care, where undifferentiated symptoms are commonplace and are associated with both minor illness and serious disease. 86,87 However, they do provide a standard of care, to improve service delivery and health outcomes against which to evaluate clinician action. 88 Comparison with existing literature Two randomised controlled trials have investigated DA testing and were not included in this review as they were not investigations for cancer: MRI for knee symptoms (the DAMASK trial) and hysterosalpingography (HSG) for infertility (the OATS trial).…”

Are guidelines for monitoring chronic disease in primary care evidence based?

“…In one study of cholesterol testing rates in Oxfordshire, 42-79% of cholesterol tests were estimated as potentially unnecessary 14. However, there is no consensus on what an inappropriate test is, and estimates of inappropriate test ordering vary substantially (0.2%–100%) 15. Most studies examining inappropriate testing compare testing rates to guideline recommendations rather than to robust evidence on what constitutes an appropriate or inappropriate test.…”

Explaining variations in test ordering in primary care: protocol for a realist review

“…Two existing systematic reviews assess ‘inappropriate’ undertesting and overtesting in secondary 14 and primary 12 care settings: both identified significant variation in practice across a wide range of tests and settings. One health technology assessment considers the extent and consequences of routine preoperative testing.…”

“…Here, the overall problem of medical overuse and the specific issues of overtesting and undertesting are characterised as ‘complex’: the literature suggests multiple potential causes operating at different levels, as well as potential emergent effects, whereby (eg) more testing generates even more testing, 25 80 and variable outcomes exist (eg, undertesting and overtesting coexist in the same healthcare system). 12 81 Decisions to order tests in primary care are made within the context of the interaction between provider and patient; as such there are multiple opportunities for the reasoning and behaviour of both parties to influence the outcome. 82…”