2003
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success

Abstract: Male contests for access to receptive females are thought to have selected for the larger male body size and conspicuous weaponry frequently observed in mammalian species. However, when females copulate with multiple males within an oestrus, male reproductive success is a function of both pre-and postcopulatory strategies. The relative importance of these overt and covert forms of sexual competition has rarely been assessed in wild populations. The Soay sheep mating system is characterized by male contests for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
240
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(63 reference statements)
8
240
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, primate sexual swellings are associated with multi-male mating and promiscuity . Testes mass is also associated with mating group size and promiscuity (Harcourt et al, 1981;Preston et al, 2003). Promiscuity and larger mating group sizes facilitate mucosal contact and transmission of microbes among many mating partners, whereas perineal swellings increase the length and volume of the vagina, and consequently increase exposure to microbes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, primate sexual swellings are associated with multi-male mating and promiscuity . Testes mass is also associated with mating group size and promiscuity (Harcourt et al, 1981;Preston et al, 2003). Promiscuity and larger mating group sizes facilitate mucosal contact and transmission of microbes among many mating partners, whereas perineal swellings increase the length and volume of the vagina, and consequently increase exposure to microbes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested above (examples 2, 7), some morphological traits may be subject to stabilizing sexual selection: for example, combat success may be maximized with a particular relative weapon size (Clutton-Brock 1982; Kitchener 2000; but see Preston et al 2001Preston et al , 2003, multiple mechanisms of sexual selection may exert conflicting selection on a trait (Moore and Moore 1999;Bonduriansky and Rowe 2003), or sexual and viability selection may balance (e.g., Wilkinson 1987). Our model suggests that selection on the trait size to body size ratio per se produces isometric scaling (example 2), while more complex functions that yield net stabilizing selection on trait size (example 7) may produce other allometric patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is unclear but horn base circumference may have experienced greater sexually antagonistic selection than horn length. While most studies of sexual selection in sheep have focused on male horn length (for example, Coltman et al, 2002;Preston et al, 2003), there is no obvious reason to expect sexual selection to act on horn length more than horn base circumference. Horn base circumference is likely more important than horn length for fighting because males clash their horns near the base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%