Overshadowing of running-based taste aversion learning by another taste cue

Effect of pretrial running on running-based taste aversion learning in rats.

“…The running-based CTA has been replicated in a large number of studies (see Boakes & Nakajima, 2009, for a review) since its discovery by Lett and Grant (1996). Like more conventional, poison-based CTA, the running-based CTA has shown many behavioral features of Pavlovian conditioning, including laws of contiguity and US strength (Hayashi, Nakajima, Urushihara, & Imada, 2002), extinction and spontaneous recovery (Nakajima, 2018a), CS-preexposure effect (or latent inhibition; Heth & Pierce, 2007; Satvat & Eikelboom, 2006; Sparkes, Grant, & Lett, 2003), degraded contingency effect (Nakajima, 2008), inhibitory learning by backward conditioning (Dobek, Heth, & Pierce, 2012; Hughes & Boakes, 2008; Salvy, Pierce, Heth, & Russell, 2004), stimulus overshadowing (Nagaishi & Nakajima, 2010), associative blocking (Pierce & Heth, 2010), and higher order contextual control (Hashimoto & Nakajima, 2013).…”

Extinction of Running-Based Taste Aversion in Rats(Rattus norvegicus)

“…based CTA preparations. The features include laws of contiguity and US strength (Hayashi, Nakajima, Urushihara, & Imada, 2002), CS-preexposure effect (or latent inhibition; Heth & Pierce, 2007;Satvat & Eikelboom, 2006;Sparkes, Grant, & Lett, 2003), US-preexposure effect (Baysari & Boakes, 2004;Hughes & Boakes, 2008;Nakajima, 2015;Nakajima, Urata, & Ogawa, 2006;Salvy, Pierce, Heth, & Russell, 2002), degraded contingency effect (Nakajima, 2008), inhibitory learning by backward conditioning (Hughes & Boakes, 2008;Salvy, Pierce, Heth, & Russell, 2004), stimulus overshadowing (Nagaishi & Nakajima, 2010), associative blocking (Pierce & Heth, 2010), and higher-order contextual control .…”