2016
DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2017.1316114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overpopulation and the Lifeboat Metaphor: A Critique from an African Worldview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applied to consumption, it supports the view that wealthy people should limit “luxury emissions” to preserve ecological room for increased consumption and emissions by the global poor (Shue, 1993); it also undergirds “contract and converge” goals under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Many ethicists apply this view to population matters, arguing that it is unfair to ask poor people to limit procreation to deal with a problem they did not create and their children are unlikely to make worse (Okyere‐Manu, 2016). Since most future population growth is projected for the developing world and much attention focuses on reducing rapid growth in poorer countries, some maintain that population stabilization is largely irrelevant to dealing with GCC (Gaard, 2015).…”
Section: Rights‐based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applied to consumption, it supports the view that wealthy people should limit “luxury emissions” to preserve ecological room for increased consumption and emissions by the global poor (Shue, 1993); it also undergirds “contract and converge” goals under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Many ethicists apply this view to population matters, arguing that it is unfair to ask poor people to limit procreation to deal with a problem they did not create and their children are unlikely to make worse (Okyere‐Manu, 2016). Since most future population growth is projected for the developing world and much attention focuses on reducing rapid growth in poorer countries, some maintain that population stabilization is largely irrelevant to dealing with GCC (Gaard, 2015).…”
Section: Rights‐based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foci of these concerns have been debates around (a) whether population growth rates (largely in the so-called Global South) are unsustainably high in environmental terms (Bartlett, 2006) and (b) whether the shift towards ageing populations (currently mainly in the Global North) is unsustainable in economic terms (Valkonen and Barslund, 2019). Whilst polemics about overpopulation have gained popular currency, they have nonetheless been criticised for deflecting responsibility for the environmental damage created by economic systems in the global north to the supposed ill of higher fertility levels in the global south (Fletcher et al, 2014;Okyere-Manu, 2016). Another oft neglected point in debates about unsustainable demographic growth is that global rates of population increase are already declining and are set to plateau by the end of the current century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%