Overly Literal Interpretations of Speech in Autism: Understanding That Messages Arise from Minds

Abstract

Children with autism and children with Down's syndrome watched the following enactment. A protagonist put one item in location A and another in location B and then left the scene. Subsequently, the items were swapped the other way round. Finally, the protagonist (who remained ignorant of the swap) requested the item in A. The observing child participant was asked to judge (1) which item the protagonist wanted and (2) which item the protagonist put in A. Unlike children with Down's syndrome, those with autism made more errors in judging that the speaker wanted the item in B than in judging that the item the speaker put in A is now in B; children with autism wrongly tended to interpret utterances literally, and they did this significantly more frequently than children with Down's syndrome. We conclude that children with autism have a difficulty making nonliteral interpretations that cannot be explained as (1) a realist bias, (2) an inability to inhibit a prepotent response, and (3) a failure to keep track of the exchange of items.

Can You Play with Fire and Not Hurt Yourself? A Comparative Study in Figurative Language Comprehension between Individuals with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder

“…For children presentation modality did not affect response literalness, while for the older participants there was an advantage in the auditory modality, suggesting that idiom comprehension most probably resides in mature oral language skills. The results of the participants with autism are also consistent with other research suggesting a tendency for literal (compositional) interpretation in autism [26,72]. …”

Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions after a right-hemisphere lesion: Different patterns of deficits

“…As Mitchell, Saltmarsh, and Russell (1997) found in children with autism, our study suggests that ToM plays a role above and beyond that of executive function in pragmatic interpretation. An association of ToM deficits and executive dysfunction, rather than executive dysfunction alone, might better account for pragmatic deficits in RHD patients.…”

Mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders

“…4 Impaired TOM is a prominent cognitive theory of autism, with a large body of research identifying TOM deficits among those with autism. [31][32][33] The possibility that MNs have a role in TOM has yet to be directly tested. However a theoretical link has been made.…”