2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions after a right-hemisphere lesion: Different patterns of deficits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
82
1
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
18
82
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding, in particular for indirect request, is congruent with other researches that found a relationship between ToM and pragmatics in schizophrenia (Langdon et al, 2002) and in other clinical populations such as individuals with right-hemisphere lesions, autism and traumatic brain injury (Champagne-Lavau & Joanette, 2009;Happé , 1993;Winner, Brownell, Happe, Blum, & Pincus, 1998). These results confirm the hypothesis that pragmatic interpretation is a mind-reading exercise involving inferences concerning the speaker's mental state (Grice, 1969).…”
Section: Relationship Between Pragmatic and Tom Deficitssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This finding, in particular for indirect request, is congruent with other researches that found a relationship between ToM and pragmatics in schizophrenia (Langdon et al, 2002) and in other clinical populations such as individuals with right-hemisphere lesions, autism and traumatic brain injury (Champagne-Lavau & Joanette, 2009;Happé , 1993;Winner, Brownell, Happe, Blum, & Pincus, 1998). These results confirm the hypothesis that pragmatic interpretation is a mind-reading exercise involving inferences concerning the speaker's mental state (Grice, 1969).…”
Section: Relationship Between Pragmatic and Tom Deficitssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This also confirms the known heterogeneity found after a right-hemisphere lesion (Champagne-Lavau & Joanette, 2009). Finally, they provide interesting insights into the processes underlying the deficits in understanding irony, especially the contextual processing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, no study has shown whether the difficulty manifested by RHD individuals in understanding irony comes from a lack of sensitivity to the context (difficulty in capturing or detecting relevant contextual information) or from an inability to integrate contextual information (correctly detected). It should also be noted that not all RHD individuals present such disorders and that different patterns of deficits exist among RHD individuals (Champagne-Lavau & Joanette, 2009;Coté et al, 2007). Thus, the aim of this study was threefold: (1) to determine whether the degree of contextual incongruity influences the extent to which individuals with right-frontal-hemisphere damage understand irony; (2) to identify the disrupted process (detection versus integration of contextual information) leading to impaired irony comprehension; and (3) to identify potential different pragmatic profiles within the RHD group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, profiles could be correlated with other cognitive disorders, including dysexecutive syndrome (mental flexibility, inhibition, shared attention mechanisms) [48] or theory of mind deficits [49], for example. In the present study, the analysis could not investigate the possible connection between communication performance and related cognitive abilities, such as working memory and planning, or other executive function components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%