2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00155-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overland flow and infiltration modelling for small plots during unsteady rain: numerical results versus observed values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
146
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
146
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, by increasing the detention storage of the catchment area, the run-off volume is also changed increasingly; but the peak runoff rate changes will be firstly decreasing, and then increasing. The results gained confirm the Esteves et al research and also the Hsu research findings [Esteves et al, 2000 andHsu et al, 2002]. The way the detention storage affects the runoff depth, the run-off peak and the cumulative infiltration indexes has been represented in fig.…”
Section: B) the Effect Of The Hydraulic Conductivity (K)supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, by increasing the detention storage of the catchment area, the run-off volume is also changed increasingly; but the peak runoff rate changes will be firstly decreasing, and then increasing. The results gained confirm the Esteves et al research and also the Hsu research findings [Esteves et al, 2000 andHsu et al, 2002]. The way the detention storage affects the runoff depth, the run-off peak and the cumulative infiltration indexes has been represented in fig.…”
Section: B) the Effect Of The Hydraulic Conductivity (K)supporting
confidence: 85%
“…In 1978 and 1983, Chu used the said model for converting the raw rainfall into the excess rainfall in unsteady conditions and divided the infiltration into two stages of before ponding and during the surface ponding [Chu, 1978[Chu, , 1983. Esteves et al (2000) investigated the surface flows and the infiltration models in unsteady rainfall conditions and comparing between the numerical results and the observation values as well as the ponding phenomenon and detention storage effects on the runoff rate [Esteves et al,2000]. Swartzendruber (2000) investigated the effect of the initial ponding time, hydraulic conductivity coefficient, and interaction of the infiltration model (G-A) and binomial infiltration equation, and introduced a suitable resolving method for binomial infiltration equation using the (G-A) model [Swartzendruber, 2000].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results obtained by Esteves et al (2000) in laboratory run-off plots, indicate that despite the soil being represented by only one set of parameters, infiltration was not homogeneous all over the plot surfaces. They concluded that the microtopography had a strong effect on observed flow directions, producing small ponds along the paths of flow and altering the flow depths and velocity fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, the choice of roughness models to be used in the S-V equations is most often done with the purpose of increasing the hydrograph quality, while the actual travel time of water is ignored. In extended hydrological practice, frictional factors are usually taken from published tables or assumed spatially constant (Esteves et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation