2012
DOI: 10.1057/fsm.2012.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overconfidence and emotion regulation failure: How overconfidence leads to the disposition effect in consumer investment behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overconfident investors expect low risks and high returns when investing, but this is not guaranteed. Palomino and Sadrieh (2011) and Chu et al (2012) noted that overconfident investors engaged in stock transactions that negatively affected returns. McCannon et al (2016) found that overconfident investors made risky investment decisions.…”
Section: Overconfidence and Investment Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overconfident investors expect low risks and high returns when investing, but this is not guaranteed. Palomino and Sadrieh (2011) and Chu et al (2012) noted that overconfident investors engaged in stock transactions that negatively affected returns. McCannon et al (2016) found that overconfident investors made risky investment decisions.…”
Section: Overconfidence and Investment Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be particularly true for retail investors. Furthermore, Chu et al (2012) suggest that overconfidence (trading excessively and unnecessarily) results in a stronger disposition effect, thus highlighting a positive relation between the two biases. Chou and Wang (2011) demonstrate that, subject to positive prior returns, both overconfidence and the disposition effect act in unison and are responsible for a surge in trading volume.…”
Section: Lde In Profit and Price: The Combined Effectmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Prior research suggests that a firm’s strategies are generally influenced by the prior experiences of top executives and directors at other firms and that these experiences result in the development of particular interpretations regarding specific corporate strategies ( Chatterjee and Hambrick, 2007 , 2011 ; Wales et al, 2013 ). The more overconfident an individual is, the less likely he or she is to accept criticism, opinions of others, or be influenced by others ( Moore and Healy, 2008 ; Chu, 2012 ). Therefore, the more overconfident the CEO, the less likely the CEO will be influenced by other board members’ prior experiences ( Zhu and Chen, 2015 ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%