Overcoming the Barriers to Organic Adoption in the United States: A Look at Pragmatic Conventional Producers in Texas

Abstract

Organics is the one of the fastest growing segments in food sales. Though the amount of certified organic land is increasing, the supply of organic foods lags behind demand in the United States. The reasons for this gap include a lack of government support for organics, and the peculiarities of organics as an innovation. In an attempt to close this gap, and increase the environmental sustainability of U.S. agriculture, this paper has two objectives. The first is to document the structural and institutional constraints to organic adoption. This is accomplished through a review of organic programs and policies in the U.S., in particular the National Organic Program. The second objective is to investigate the predictors of interest and the perceived barriers to organic adoption among pragmatic conventional producers in Texas, compared to organic and conventional producers. This is accomplished through a survey of a representative sample of producers in Texas. The results indicate that more than forty percent of producers who currently have conventional operations have at least some interest in organic production (pragmatic conventional producers). There are significant differences among the three groups in their structural and attitudinal characteristics related to organic adoption. For the pragmatic conventional producers, an increase in revenue would be a major facilitator of organic adoption. Their high levels of uncertainty regarding organic production and marketing, and especially organic certification constrain organic adoption. The results also reveal that the institutional setting in the U.S. hindered adoption. The paper concludes that increased institutional support would facilitate organic adoption

Norwegian farmers ceasing certified organic production: Characteristics and reasons

“…In 2008, however, the Farm Bill for the first time provided financial support to farmers to convert to organic production. Further initiatives to support organic production were announced in 2009 (Constance and Choi, 2010).…”

“…The literature has identified a wide range of barriers to organic conversion, such as institutional, technical and individual factors, and lack of information and experience (e.g., Constance and Choi, 2010). Business agendas, lifestyle choices and environmental issues are found to be important for a farmer's decision to convert to organic farming (e.g.…”

Alternative Labeling Programs and Purchasing Behavior toward Organic Foods: The Case of the Participatory Guarantee Systems in Brazil

“…For instance, the mainstream approach linked to organic certification (the best known third-party certification, regulated in the European Union by EC Regulation 834/2007-28 June 2007) is useful for consumers by providing guarantees regarding production processes and food quality. However, while organic certification programs have contributed to the global expansion of the organic foods market, they have also made organic foods less accessible to small-scale producers and lower-income consumers worldwide, particularly in developing countries [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. For example, the costs associated with third-party certification can constrain small-scale producers from obtaining organic certification and can increase the price of organic products to the detriment of lower-income consumers.…”

Development of Organic Farming in Europe at the Crossroads: Looking for the Way Forward through System Archetypes Lenses

“…In many studies, higher labor intensity of organic production methods is cited as one of the most important barriers to conversion [23,58,59]. The growth in organic production implies thus, ceteris paribus, that more labor is required to perform the different farming activities.…”