2014
DOI: 10.1021/jz5023202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming Coulombic Traps: Geometry and Electronic Characterizations of Light-Induced Separated Spins at the Bulk Heterojunction Interface

Abstract: Recent progress is overviewed on experimental elucidations of fundamental molecular functions of the light-energy conversions by the photoactive layers of the organic photovoltalic (OPV) cells by means of the time-resolved electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Positions and orientations of the unpaired electrons and electronic coupling matrix elements are clarified in photoinduced, primary charge-separated (CS) states. Connections between the molecular geometries and the electronic couplings have been … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
7
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From D = -0.8 mT, the center-to-center separation (r CC ) between the charges is estimated to be 1.5 nm in the present CT state. In the previous study, the photoinduced CS states generated at the BHJ domain interfaces were characterized to be J = +6 T for r CC = 1.5 nm in the RR-P3HT:PCBM blends at T = 77 K [14,15]. This significantly weak J coupling was explained by a weakened electronic coupling (V) between the charges due to highly delocalized distributions in the unpaired orbitals of the mobile holes at the polymer crystalline phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…From D = -0.8 mT, the center-to-center separation (r CC ) between the charges is estimated to be 1.5 nm in the present CT state. In the previous study, the photoinduced CS states generated at the BHJ domain interfaces were characterized to be J = +6 T for r CC = 1.5 nm in the RR-P3HT:PCBM blends at T = 77 K [14,15]. This significantly weak J coupling was explained by a weakened electronic coupling (V) between the charges due to highly delocalized distributions in the unpaired orbitals of the mobile holes at the polymer crystalline phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…10,51,54,55 There has been much discussion in the literature about the mechanism by which efficient electron-hole dissociation occurs at the donor/acceptor interface, overcoming energy barriers largely exceeding the thermal quantum. 7,11,52,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62] Figure 4, right panel, shows that for all the three donors ln k CT b scales linearly with E b , so that as E b increases dissociation into separated charges becomes rapidly exceedingly slow, no longer competitive with decay to the ground state. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Table 3: Reorganization energies (eV) of the donor dyes for photo-excitation, and for photoinduced charge separation, charge recombination via triplet, and hole hopping half-reactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical details how one can compute and evaluate the time-evolutions of the transverse magnetizations have been reported in our previous studies [5,6,11]. Figure 4 shows the geometries of the interfacial CS states to reproduce the TREPR spectra in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%