2016
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1173261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Over reported and misunderstood? A study of teachers’ reported enactment and knowledge of inquiry-based science teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests that the instructional model used during a pedagogy-focused RET shapes how the teachers who participate in that program think about inquiry. This explanation is also consistent with the way teachers use their personal experiences to describe what counts as inquiry rather than the way inquiry is conceptualized and described in the science education literature (e.g., Capps et al, 2016;Gallagher & Parker, 1995). The model of inquiry that was used during the RET program, as a result, became the model that these teachers used to define what does and what does not count as inquiry-based instruction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding suggests that the instructional model used during a pedagogy-focused RET shapes how the teachers who participate in that program think about inquiry. This explanation is also consistent with the way teachers use their personal experiences to describe what counts as inquiry rather than the way inquiry is conceptualized and described in the science education literature (e.g., Capps et al, 2016;Gallagher & Parker, 1995). The model of inquiry that was used during the RET program, as a result, became the model that these teachers used to define what does and what does not count as inquiry-based instruction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The NGSS assert that students need more opportunities to participate in the practices of science while in school in order to be ready to enter a science or science related career and appreciate knowledge gained through science, not simply learn about these practices secondhand (NGSS Lead States, 2013). A review of the literature found teachers' enactment of inquiry-based science practices ranges from often to rare, with concerns that what some teachers were calling inquiry did not correspond to those promoted by US national standards (Capps, Shemwell, & Young, 2016). Blanchard, Osborne, Wallwork, and Harris (2013) found that science teachers' self-reported use of inquiry-based practices (a definition of inquiry was provided) most depended on their comfort with inquiry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apesar disso, a maioria dos estudos tem apontado a pouca presença do EnCI na sala de aula e os muitos desafios e dilemas que os professores enfrentam ao tentar trazer essa abordagem para sua prática (Krämer et al, 2015). Apesar da grande divulgação do EnCI, poucos documentos oferecem definições e formas de operacionalizar essa abordagem (Borda Carulla, 2012;Capps et al, 2016) o que pode ter gerado concepções equivocadas e incompreensões por parte dos docentes.…”
Section: Os Desafios De Ensinar Ciências Por Investigaçãounclassified
“…Essa porcentagem, considerada alta, parece incongruente com os inúmeros desafios de aplicação do EnCI reportados pela literatura (Capps, Crawford, & Constas, 2012). Esse contraste intrigou um grupo de pesquisadores que, a partir dos resultados de uma pesquisa do tipo survey, concluíram que apesar de muitos professores acreditarem realizar atividades investigativas com certa frequência, poucos têm um conhecimento bem estruturado sobre o EnCI (Capps, Shemwell, & Young, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Though potentially useful, the foundations of implementation studies are weakened if they are founded on uninterrogated assumptions about developers' intentions (e.g., Polikoff, ). As an example of the disconnect, educators across the spectrum possess varied interpretations of the term inquiry found in many K‐12 science standards (Capps, Shemwell, & Young, ; Morrow, ). Examining developers' thinking, the evidence on which they draw, and the values they embed in standards is a necessary step toward better assessing connections between development and enactment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%