2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(99)00050-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Over-education and earnings: where are we, where should we go?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
858
1
91

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 838 publications
(1,005 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
31
858
1
91
Order By: Relevance
“…Good present job offers survive, leading to high job levels for high tenure. But good outside offers draw workers away, generating high job levels for low tenures (Hartog, 2000a;Garen 1988). Overeducation and its earnings consequences cannot unambiguously be related to selective mobility.…”
Section: Oru As a Firm Wage Effect?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good present job offers survive, leading to high job levels for high tenure. But good outside offers draw workers away, generating high job levels for low tenures (Hartog, 2000a;Garen 1988). Overeducation and its earnings consequences cannot unambiguously be related to selective mobility.…”
Section: Oru As a Firm Wage Effect?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is widely believed that, when comparing the same occupation, the overeducated receives significantly lower salaries when compared with those with adequate education. For those with the same education level, workers who are overeducated receive higher salaries than those with adequate education [10], [11].…”
Section: B the Causes Of Overeducation And The Rate Of Return On Edumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method allows the study subjects to assess whether they are overeducated or undereducated in terms of the relation between the education level required for their work and their own qualifications; this method is also known as the WA method. Objective measurement methods are usually based on surveys on the present state of human resources and are divided into four types: one is the job analysis method [11], which is otherwise known as the JA method; the education level required for the job is decided based on an analysis of the job specifications. Another type is the modal method; the education level required for the job is decided based on the education level of the majority.…”
Section: The Measurement Of Overeducationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of a large number of studies on the issue, there is no uniform definition of over-education (Dolton and Vignoles, 2000;Hartog, 2000) and in many cases the definition used depends on the available data. Each of the several approaches used to measure the degree of mismatch has its own limitations (Note 11).…”
Section: Educational Mismatchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are basically three approaches: job analysis, the statistical approach, and workers self-assessment. For a description of these methods, see Hartog (2000).…”
Section: Research In Applied Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%