The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2015.7403415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Output to input saturation transformation: Demonstration and application to disturbed linear systems

Abstract: In the case of linear systems, control law design is often performed so that the resulting closed-loop meets specific frequency requirements. However, in many cases, it may be observed that the obtained controller does not enforce timedomain requirements amongst which the objective of keeping an output variable in a given interval. In this article, a transformation is proposed to convert expected bounds on an output variable into time-varying saturations on the synthesized linear control law. It is demonstrate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goodwin and de Dona (2004), Glattfelder and Schaufelberger (2003), a popular idea consists of modifying a nominal controller whenever the constraints are about to be violated. Following this line, the Output to Input Saturation Transformation (OIST) approach was recently proposed in Burlion (2012); Chambon, Burlion, and Apkarian (2015a) to replace the state constraints by some state-dependent control saturations. Such an approach is attractive because it enables use of the vast literature on control saturation problems and may especially lead to consider anti-windup loops which are now well understood (see e.g Galeani, Tarbouriech, Turner, and Zaccarian (2009); Tarbouriech and Turner (2009)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goodwin and de Dona (2004), Glattfelder and Schaufelberger (2003), a popular idea consists of modifying a nominal controller whenever the constraints are about to be violated. Following this line, the Output to Input Saturation Transformation (OIST) approach was recently proposed in Burlion (2012); Chambon, Burlion, and Apkarian (2015a) to replace the state constraints by some state-dependent control saturations. Such an approach is attractive because it enables use of the vast literature on control saturation problems and may especially lead to consider anti-windup loops which are now well understood (see e.g Galeani, Tarbouriech, Turner, and Zaccarian (2009); Tarbouriech and Turner (2009)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this method along with some assumptions, it is possible to obtain guarantees on the fulfilment of the time-domain constraints when an unsatisfactory control law has already been designed. This article is an extension of the work presented in Chambon, Burlion, and Apkarian (2015a). It gives a comprehensive description of the method for minimum-phase linear systems with unknown finite-energy bounded disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the anti-windup framework [13], [14] can be applied in combination with the OIST technique (see e.g. [15]). In this paper, we propose to show how the OIST technique can be applied to the problem of UAV obstacle avoidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%