2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20072050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Output-Only Damage Detection of Shear Building Structures Using an Autoregressive Model-Enhanced Optimal Subpattern Assignment Metric

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel output-only structural damage indicator by incorporating the pole-based optimal subpattern assignment distance with autoregressive models to localize and relatively assess the severity of damages for sheared structures. Autoregressive models can model dynamic systems well, while their model poles can represent the state of the dynamic systems. Structural damage generally causes changes in the dynamic characteristics (especially the natural frequency, mode shapes and damping ratio) o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of parameters was given in [ 53 ]. The OSPA distance has been used widely in the literature [ 44 , 54 , 55 , 56 ] and has better properties for the multitarget error evaluation than the Hausdorff metric. In addition, there are various improved methods based on the OSPA [ 57 ], which are be enumerated as follows: Generalized OSPA (GOSPA): In the GOSPA metric, we look for an optimal assignment between the truth targets and the estimated tracks, leaving missed and false targets unsigned [ 58 ].…”
Section: A Classification Of the Comprehensive Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of parameters was given in [ 53 ]. The OSPA distance has been used widely in the literature [ 44 , 54 , 55 , 56 ] and has better properties for the multitarget error evaluation than the Hausdorff metric. In addition, there are various improved methods based on the OSPA [ 57 ], which are be enumerated as follows: Generalized OSPA (GOSPA): In the GOSPA metric, we look for an optimal assignment between the truth targets and the estimated tracks, leaving missed and false targets unsigned [ 58 ].…”
Section: A Classification Of the Comprehensive Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of parameters was given in [ 53 ]. The OSPA distance has been used widely in the literature [ 44 , 54 , 55 , 56 ] and has better properties for the multitarget error evaluation than the Hausdorff metric.…”
Section: A Classification Of the Comprehensive Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are easy to implement with low computational cost, but their performance is heavily affected by the trend information of historical observations, which may be unreliable during incipient failure stage and for long-term forecasts (Baur et al, 2020). Recent examples of using regression-based prognostic models include Qian et al (2014) for bearing wear-out, Barraza-Barraza et al (2017) for crack growth in aluminum plates, Nguyen et al (2018) for NPP steam generator degradation, and Mei et al (2020) for shear building structural damage. In Markovian-based models, the degradation process is assumed to transform within a finite state space that satisfies the Markov (or memoryless) property.…”
Section: Statistical-based Prognosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former step is a signal processing strategy, which aims at extracting meaningful information (here called damage-sensitive features) from raw measured data (e.g., acceleration time histories), while the latter is a machine learning algorithm for analyzing and classifying the extracted features for early damage detection, localization and quantification [4][5][6][7]. Time series modeling is one of the powerful feature extraction methods, which is intended to fit a parametric representation (model) to raw measured data [8,9]. Coefficient-based and residual-based algorithms are two different feature extraction methods via time series modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%