2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22030793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation Metrics and Approaches for Target Tracking: A Survey

Abstract: Performance evaluation (PE) plays a key role in the design and validation of any target-tracking algorithms. In fact, it is often closely related to the definition and derivation of the optimality/suboptimality of an algorithm such as that all minimum mean-squared error estimators are based on the minimization of the mean-squared error of the estimation. In this paper, we review both classic and emerging novel PE metrics and approaches in the context of estimation and target tracking. First, we briefly review … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the number of elements of the real set and estimated set of the states of the targets is different, the root-mean-square type of evaluation (such as the root mean square error) is not usable. In this article, optimal sub-pattern assignment (OSPA) error is selected to evaluate the multi-target tracking performance, which is defined as follows [41]:…”
Section: Algorithm Of Vb-gmcphd Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the number of elements of the real set and estimated set of the states of the targets is different, the root-mean-square type of evaluation (such as the root mean square error) is not usable. In this article, optimal sub-pattern assignment (OSPA) error is selected to evaluate the multi-target tracking performance, which is defined as follows [41]:…”
Section: Algorithm Of Vb-gmcphd Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different performance measures can be used to evaluate a tracking process as explained in [19], [20]. These include statistical measures such as accuracy and error measures used to evaluate the statistical performance of a model, and system performance measures such as time and space complexities used to evaluate the computational performance of a model.…”
Section: Performance Measures and Analytical Comparsionsmentioning
confidence: 99%