2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-020-01601-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outer approximation for global optimization of mixed-integer quadratic bilevel problems

Abstract: Bilevel optimization problems have received a lot of attention in the last years and decades. Besides numerous theoretical developments there also evolved novel solution algorithms for mixed-integer linear bilevel problems and the most recent algorithms use branch-and-cut techniques from mixed-integer programming that are especially tailored for the bilevel context. In this paper, we consider MIQP-QP bilevel problems, i.e., models with a mixed-integer convex-quadratic upper level and a continuous convex-quadra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While instances of the special variant of model R-MILP when the maximal number M of drones at each DB is fixed and equal to 1 (i.e., each open DB is an M/G/1 system) can be solved, preliminary experiments reveal that state-of-the-art solvers are however unable to solve, within 1 hour, the root node of the continuous relaxation of the moderate-sized R-MILP problem instances for M ≥ 2. To overcome this issue, we derive an MILP relaxation for problem R − MILP using lazy constraints (see, e.g., [32,35]) and embed it in an outer approximation algorithm. The motivation is to alleviate the issue caused by the significantly lifted decision and constraint space due to the linearization method.…”
Section: Outer Approximation Algorithm With Lazy Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While instances of the special variant of model R-MILP when the maximal number M of drones at each DB is fixed and equal to 1 (i.e., each open DB is an M/G/1 system) can be solved, preliminary experiments reveal that state-of-the-art solvers are however unable to solve, within 1 hour, the root node of the continuous relaxation of the moderate-sized R-MILP problem instances for M ≥ 2. To overcome this issue, we derive an MILP relaxation for problem R − MILP using lazy constraints (see, e.g., [32,35]) and embed it in an outer approximation algorithm. The motivation is to alleviate the issue caused by the significantly lifted decision and constraint space due to the linearization method.…”
Section: Outer Approximation Algorithm With Lazy Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to solution approaches, a distinction between problems with convex and non-convex follower problem can be made. For BPs with a convex follower problem, single-level reformulation techniques based on, e.g., Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions or strong duality (see, e.g., [12,30,32]) can be used. For MIBLPs with integrality restrictions on (some of) the follower variables, state-of-the-art methods are usually based on B&C (see, e.g., [18,19,49]).…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution algorithm for mixed-IBNPs proposed in [40] by Lozano and Smith approximates the value function by dynamically inserting additional variables and big-M type constraints. Recently, Kleinert et al [30] considered BPs with a mixed-integer convex-quadratic leader and a continuous convex-quadratic follower problem. The method is based on outer approximation after the problem is reformulated into a singlelevel one using strong duality and convexification.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years, algorithmic research on bilevel optimization focused on more and more complicated lower-level problems such as mixed-integer linear models (Fischetti et al 2017(Fischetti et al , 2018, nonlinear but still convex models (Kleinert, Grimm, et al 2021), or problems in the lower level with uncertain data (Buchheim and Henke 2022;Burtscheidt and Claus 2020). When it comes to the situation of a lowerlevel problem with continuous nonlinearities there is not too much literature-in particular in comparison to the case in which the lower-level problem is convex; see, e.g., Kleniati and Adjiman (2011, 2014a,b, 2015, Mitsos (2010), Mitsos et al (2008), , Paulavičius, Gao, et al (2020), and Paulavičius et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%