2015
DOI: 10.1121/1.4929928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outdoor measurements of spherical acoustic shock decay

Abstract: Prior anechoic measurements of a small acetylene-oxygen balloon explosion were used to study spherical weak-shock decay over short ranges [Muhlestein et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 2422–2430 (2012)]. Here, longer-range measurements conducted at the Bonneville Salt Flats with a larger balloon are described. Waveform and spectral characteristics and comparisons of the peak pressure decay with an analytical weak-shock model are presented. Weak shocks persist to at least 305 m, with an amplitude decay that is pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that while the Maekawa [1968] chart is commonly used as a first-order noise reduction estimate regardless of source-receiver geometry [e.g. Ekici and Bougdah 2003;Ettouney and Fricke 1973;Plotkin et al 2009;Scholes et al 1971;Vu 2007;Young et al 2015], Maekawa [1968] states that it is intended for cases where the source and receivers are in the air. This condition allows direct comparison between diffracted measurements and free-field estimates since the influence of ground reflection can be avoided.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that while the Maekawa [1968] chart is commonly used as a first-order noise reduction estimate regardless of source-receiver geometry [e.g. Ekici and Bougdah 2003;Ettouney and Fricke 1973;Plotkin et al 2009;Scholes et al 1971;Vu 2007;Young et al 2015], Maekawa [1968] states that it is intended for cases where the source and receivers are in the air. This condition allows direct comparison between diffracted measurements and free-field estimates since the influence of ground reflection can be avoided.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, peak pressure of a weak shock (e.g. Muhlestein et al 2012;Rogers 1977;Young et al 2015) decays with a power of radius slightly larger than 1. Such a dependency may be observed in the presented data (Figure 8a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more in‐depth analysis that focuses on the complete seismo‐acoustic data set of the presented experiments may help here. For example, peak pressure of a weak shock (e.g., Muhlestein et al., 2012; Rogers, 1977; Young et al., 2015) decays with a power of radius slightly larger than 1. Such a dependency may be observed in the presented data (Figure 8a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, peak pressure of a weak shock (e.g. Young et al, 2015;Muhlestein et al, 2012;Rogers, 1977) decays with a power of radius slightly larger than 1. Such a dependency may be observed in the presented data (Figure 9a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%