2011
DOI: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.12.829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Transurethral Removal of Intravesical or Intraurethral Mesh Following Midurethral Sling Surgery

Abstract: PurposeTo present outcomes of transurethral removal (TUR) of intravesical or intraurethral mesh after midurethral slings.Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective chart review of 23 consecutive women: 20 with intravesical mesh and 3 with intraurethral mesh.ResultsTo remove the mesh, transurethral resection with an electrode loop (TUR-E) was used in 16 women and transurethral resection with a holmium laser (TUR-H) was used in 7. The median follow-up was 2.1 months. Twenty-six percent of the women (6/23) had… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last 2 decades the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has shifted to a midurethral sling (MUS) or a mesh-based bladder neck procedure [1]. Although the surgery was believed to be relatively safe, there has been a steep rise in the number of reported cases of their erosion into the lower urinary tract [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Mesh erosion was first reported in 2001 but is now recognized as a major long-term complication of MUS surgery with an incidence rate of between 0.6 and 5.4% [2,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 2 decades the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has shifted to a midurethral sling (MUS) or a mesh-based bladder neck procedure [1]. Although the surgery was believed to be relatively safe, there has been a steep rise in the number of reported cases of their erosion into the lower urinary tract [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Mesh erosion was first reported in 2001 but is now recognized as a major long-term complication of MUS surgery with an incidence rate of between 0.6 and 5.4% [2,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TUR-E was successful in 93.7 % of patients with only one recurrence of mesh erosion, and success was not affected by location of the mesh in the urethra or bladder. However, a vesicovaginal fistula developed in two patients, and bladder perforation is also a risk with TUR-E, which may require extended catheterization [11]. In comparison, we found a symptomatic success rate of 80 % with TEEH and anatomic success in 67 % overall and in 80 % of those with bladder erosions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…These patients may present with multiple symptoms, including dysuria, hematuria, and irritative or obstructive urinary symptoms after surgery. 7 Bladder injuries should be considered in patients presenting with such symptoms, even if needleless surgery was performed. The use of cystoscopy in such cases is useful to confirm the perforation diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%