2013
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Permanent Peritoneal Ports for the Management of Recurrent Malignant Ascites

Abstract: A total of 155 drainages were performed in 24 patients; 26% of drainages (n=40) in the patient's home and the remainder in the ambulatory care clinic. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occured in less than 25% of all draining procedures. An improvement in symptoms was demonstrated in almost half of all individual drainage procedures. Our findings suggest that peritoneal ports are efficacious, safe, and are associated with symptomatic relief in most patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a marked difference in the complication rate of 56% (n = 46) in patients with catheters compared with 17% (n = 11) in the group where no catheters were placed ( P < .001). These observations correlate with recent literature reports, 18,24,3638 although we found a higher incidence of infections (spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; SBP) with 23% (n = 26) in patients with a catheter compared with 6% (n = 4) who had a paracenteses only. The increased rate of infections could be secondary to bacterial access during procedure, or through direct contact with the abdominal cavity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found a marked difference in the complication rate of 56% (n = 46) in patients with catheters compared with 17% (n = 11) in the group where no catheters were placed ( P < .001). These observations correlate with recent literature reports, 18,24,3638 although we found a higher incidence of infections (spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; SBP) with 23% (n = 26) in patients with a catheter compared with 6% (n = 4) who had a paracenteses only. The increased rate of infections could be secondary to bacterial access during procedure, or through direct contact with the abdominal cavity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…16 The latter was originally developed in 1968 by Henry Tenckhoff as an indwelling peritoneal dialysis catheter 17 that has been shown to be effective. 18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of patients with malignant ascites experience progressive abdominal swelling and troublesome symptoms such as pain, nausea, dyspnea, constipation, and edema (3). With the exception of ovarian cancer, malignant ascites typically have a poor prognosis and a median survival time of no more than 4 months (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic stenting has been shown to have similar success rate as surgery with less morbidity. 26,27 However, the risk of recurrent biliary obstruction before death is higher in patients undergoing endoscopic stent placement.…”
Section: Biliary Obstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success rates for permanent intraperitoneal catheters functioning until death are quite high (90%). 28,29 Major complications are obstruction and infection, and are approximately 17%, 27 although catheter sepsis has been reported to be 35%. 30 To avoid infection, nurses must follow patients closely and provide education to patients and caregivers on drainage and care of the catheter.…”
Section: Malignant Ascitesmentioning
confidence: 99%