2014
DOI: 10.5388/aon.2014.14.4.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Fast-Track Program after Colorectal Cancer Surgery - Comparison with Conventional Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to these findings, Kim et al [12] designed a study to compare two independent samples: patients who were placed in a conventional program and patients who were placed in a fast-track program using the care map. The fast-track concept adopted by authors included also the following steps: no bowel preparation, pre-operative oral hydration, oral intake as soon as possible post-operatively.…”
Section: [18]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to these findings, Kim et al [12] designed a study to compare two independent samples: patients who were placed in a conventional program and patients who were placed in a fast-track program using the care map. The fast-track concept adopted by authors included also the following steps: no bowel preparation, pre-operative oral hydration, oral intake as soon as possible post-operatively.…”
Section: [18]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About nutrition risk and management is the study conducted by Gillis et al [14]. Preoperative nutrition education may be useful to optimize nutrition status [14,12] and, additionally, adequacy of dietary intake was determined for the first 3 postoperative days [14]. So, it is necessary a multidisciplinary approach and an institutional policy to optimize patient's nutrition status *16, 17, 18, 19+.…”
Section: [18]mentioning
confidence: 99%