2013
DOI: 10.1128/aac.02235-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Appropriate Empiric Combination versus Monotherapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia

Abstract: e Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia is associated with high hospital mortality. Empirical combination therapy is commonly used to increase the likelihood of appropriate therapy, but the benefits of employing >1 active agent have yet to be established. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients receiving appropriate empirical combination versus monotherapy for P. aeruginosa bacteremia. This was a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study of hospitalized adult patients with P. aeruginosa bacter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29,30 These studies further support our conclusion that if a sufficiently broad-spectrum b-lactam agent is selected, in the absence of risk factors for MDRGN organisms, b-lactam monotherapy should be adequate.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 71%
“…29,30 These studies further support our conclusion that if a sufficiently broad-spectrum b-lactam agent is selected, in the absence of risk factors for MDRGN organisms, b-lactam monotherapy should be adequate.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 71%
“…P. aeruginosa bacteremia, in particular, is associated with high mortality. Reported mortality rates exceed 50% in some series and are even higher within certain populations, such as in patients with severe underlying comorbid conditions or those with immunosuppression [5]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delayed treatment of the source infection was also associated with an increase in mortality of 1% per hour [106]. Diverse other studies were also able to prove the association of a delayed first application with increased mortality [6,[107][108][109][110][111] and worsening of secondary endpoints (e. g., acute kidney damage; development of acute respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS; increase of the SOFA score; [112][113][114]) among the investigated patient collective. It is therefore not surprising that rash initiation of a calculated antibiotic therapy is one of the most important cornerstones of sepsis treatment [1,7,76,[115][116][117][118][119] and a central element of current guidelines [7].…”
Section: Principles Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 78%