2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer with Radical Cystectomy or Trimodal Therapy in US Veterans

Abstract: Background Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) remains undertreated despite multiple potentially curative options. Both radical cystectomy (RC) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trimodal therapy (TMT), including transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by chemoradiotherapy, are standard treatments. Objective To evaluate real-world clinical outcomes of RC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RC-NAC), RC without NAC, TMT with National Comprehensive Cancer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given that the rate of locoregional failure in this cohort appears similar to respective rates within prospective cohorts [15] , [16] , we postulate a similar pattern of more non-muscle-invasive recurrences than muscle-invasive recurrences within this cohort. In conjunction with additional retrospective studies demonstrating similar outcomes between MIBC treated with RC and MIBC treated with CRT in appropriately selected individuals [17] , [18] , CRT appears to be an efficacious option for many patients with MIBC. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, attention has been brought to the impact of delay in oncologic treatment as hospital systems react to the fluctuations in COVID-19 burden to minimize risk of spread and mitigate risk of COVID-19 disease complications in at risk-individuals [1] , [2] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, given that the rate of locoregional failure in this cohort appears similar to respective rates within prospective cohorts [15] , [16] , we postulate a similar pattern of more non-muscle-invasive recurrences than muscle-invasive recurrences within this cohort. In conjunction with additional retrospective studies demonstrating similar outcomes between MIBC treated with RC and MIBC treated with CRT in appropriately selected individuals [17] , [18] , CRT appears to be an efficacious option for many patients with MIBC. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, attention has been brought to the impact of delay in oncologic treatment as hospital systems react to the fluctuations in COVID-19 burden to minimize risk of spread and mitigate risk of COVID-19 disease complications in at risk-individuals [1] , [2] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men, with most patients presenting with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer 47–49 . Despite early intervention with intravesical therapies, many patients develop recurrent disease or progress to muscle-invasive bladder cancer, where the primary treatment is radical cystectomy or trimodal therapy 50,51 . Half of patients who undergo radical cystectomy will recur within 2 years, and a portion will develop distal metastases 52,53 .…”
Section: Act In Bladder Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47][48][49] Despite early intervention with intravesical therapies, many patients develop recurrent disease or progress to muscleinvasive bladder cancer, where the primary treatment is radical cystectomy or trimodal therapy. 50,51 Half of patients who undergo radical cystectomy will recur within 2 years, and a portion will develop distal metastases. 52,53 This high rate of disease recurrence and lack of therapeutic durability in multiple stages of treatment highlight a gap in bladder cancer disease management.…”
Section: Act In Bladder Cancer Bladder Cancer Background and Clinical...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Schuettfort et al reported a disease-free survival of 54.3 and 45.6% at 5 and 10 years after salvage radical cystectomy [15]. However, given the previously radiated field, concern for higher rates of postoperative complications has hampered its wide-spread utilization with approximately 3.6–20% of patients requiring salvage radical cystectomy after trimodal therapy [15,16]. Pieretti et al reported that salvage radical cystectomy was associated with higher rates of late complications or those occurring greater than 90 days postoperatively such as small bowel obstruction in 15%, stomal stenosis in 5%, and distal ureteral stricture in 15% compared with primary cystectomy where they reported rates of 2.4, 1.9, and 3.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Salvage Radical Cystectomy After Trimodal Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%