2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes associated with scheduling or up-scheduling controlled substances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The legalization of a previously controlled substance (e.g., marijuana) or the conversion of a prescription drug to an OTC drug (e.g., steroids) is called down-scheduling, whereas the placement of an OTC drug under prescription or full regulation is called up-scheduling [ 17 ]. In some countries and regions, OTC drugs that have become a public health problem are up-scheduled into drugs that require a physician’s prescription.…”
Section: Case Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legalization of a previously controlled substance (e.g., marijuana) or the conversion of a prescription drug to an OTC drug (e.g., steroids) is called down-scheduling, whereas the placement of an OTC drug under prescription or full regulation is called up-scheduling [ 17 ]. In some countries and regions, OTC drugs that have become a public health problem are up-scheduled into drugs that require a physician’s prescription.…”
Section: Case Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variety of sources used to obtain OTC/POMs highlights that making changes to supplies from pharmacies or prescribing changes in isolation (eg, in the case of codeine) 83 would be unlikely to completely ameliorate availability, especially where online sales and street dealing remains ongoing: indeed such approaches may result in unintended consequences such as people seeking unregulated alternatives. 84 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…82 The variety of sources used to obtain OTC/POMs highlights that making changes to supplies from pharmacies or prescribing changes in isolation (eg, in the case of codeine) 83 would be unlikely to completely ameliorate availability, especially where online sales and street dealing remains ongoing: indeed such approaches may result in unintended consequences such as people seeking unregulated alternatives. 84 The frequency that the need for improvement in raising awareness of OTC/POM misuse and other changes to healthcare provision was commented upon was notable. Despite the age of some of the publications, it was observed how much of an issue this remains to be, especially given the recent national review by Marsden et al 39 This highlights the need for continued developments and a greater understanding of how best to undertake these required improvements.…”
Section: Implications For Clinicians Policymakers and Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, if steps are taken to limit access, for example by rescheduling/ceasing prescribing of opioid products, these should be implemented with care to avoid unintended consequences such as people seeking unregulated alternatives. 65,66…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, if steps are taken to limit access, for example by rescheduling/ceasing prescribing of opioid products, these should be implemented with care to avoid unintended consequences such as people seeking unregulated alternatives. 65,66 Since data saturation was not felt to have been achieved, additional research, such as qualitative interviews should allow for more detailed exploration and enable triangulation to assess the validity of the findings. This could support a greater understanding of the reasons for OTC/POM misuse, impact upon other substances used, physical/mental wellbeing, harm reduction provision (such as take home naloxone supplies) and views about SMS developments identified from the questionnaire.…”
Section: Implications For Clinicians Policymakers and Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%