2022
DOI: 10.1177/11782218221135875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveying Over the Counter and Prescription Only Medication Misuse in Treatment Services During COVID-19

Abstract: Background: A greater understanding of Over the Counter (OTC) and Prescription Only Medication (POM) misuse amongst adults accessing substance misuse services (SMS) during COVID-19 is required to identify how SMS can better meet the needs of the people who require treatment. Aim: To use a questionnaire to explore OTC/POM misuse during COVID-19 in adults accessing community SMS in England. Methods: In 2020 to 2021 anonymous self-administered online/paper questionnaires which collated quantitative and qualitativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2020 No Yes S11 Garg et al, 2022 [ 79 ] Canada To investigate the impact of COVID-19, [including the] subsequent change in OAT guidance, on OAT discontinuation" (p. 2) Time series study Apr. 2019 Nov. 2020 Yes No S12 Gittins et al, 2022 [ 80 ] United Kingdom (England) To explore over-the-counter and prescription drug misuse among SMS [substance misuse services] clients during COVID-19 Mixed methods (qualitative/cross-sectional) Aug. 2020 Aug. 2021 No Yes S13 Gomes et al, 2022 [ 81 ] Canada "to evaluate whether increased access to take-home doses of OAT related to pandemic specific guidance was associated with changes in treatment retention and opioid-related harms" (p. 847) Cohort study Feb. 2020 NR Yes No S14 Harris et al, 2022 [ 82 ] United States "to explore how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted MOUD and addiction service experiences." (p. 2) Qualitative study Aug. 2020 Oct. 2020 No Yes S15 Hoffman et al, 2022 [ 83 ] United States "to assess patients' responses to the enhanced access to take-home methadone" (p.2) Mixed methods (qualitative/before-and-after) Sept. 2019 Dec. 2020 Yes Yes S16 Javakhishv...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2020 No Yes S11 Garg et al, 2022 [ 79 ] Canada To investigate the impact of COVID-19, [including the] subsequent change in OAT guidance, on OAT discontinuation" (p. 2) Time series study Apr. 2019 Nov. 2020 Yes No S12 Gittins et al, 2022 [ 80 ] United Kingdom (England) To explore over-the-counter and prescription drug misuse among SMS [substance misuse services] clients during COVID-19 Mixed methods (qualitative/cross-sectional) Aug. 2020 Aug. 2021 No Yes S13 Gomes et al, 2022 [ 81 ] Canada "to evaluate whether increased access to take-home doses of OAT related to pandemic specific guidance was associated with changes in treatment retention and opioid-related harms" (p. 847) Cohort study Feb. 2020 NR Yes No S14 Harris et al, 2022 [ 82 ] United States "to explore how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted MOUD and addiction service experiences." (p. 2) Qualitative study Aug. 2020 Oct. 2020 No Yes S15 Hoffman et al, 2022 [ 83 ] United States "to assess patients' responses to the enhanced access to take-home methadone" (p.2) Mixed methods (qualitative/before-and-after) Sept. 2019 Dec. 2020 Yes Yes S16 Javakhishv...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation? S1 Abidogun et al, 2023 [ 69 ] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes S5 Conway et al, 2023 [ 73 ] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes S10 Gage et al, 2022 [ 78 ] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes S12 Gittins et al, 2022 [ 80 ] Yes No Can't tell Yes Yes S14 Harris et al, 2022 [ 82 ] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes S15 Hoffman et al, 2022 [ 83 ] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes S16 Javakhishvili et al, 2021 [ 84 ] Yes Yes Can't tell Yes Yes S19 Krawczyk et al, 2021 [ 87 ] Yes Yes ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although only eight interviews were conducted, a rich data set was still obtained and themes were identified; indeed Guest et al, (2006) have indicated that the ‘ basic elements for metathemes’ may occur with just six interviews. Additionally such approaches with limited sample sizes have been successful in sensitive subject matters such as this (Gittins et al, 2018) and the challenges in recruitment during the pandemic have been similarly reported (Gittins et al, 2022b). Greater assurance in the findings may have been achieved if repeat interviews and member-checking were implemented, and this could be considered as a future development to strengthen data reliability and validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thematic analysis was used for the associated qualitative data. All researchers were suitably experienced in qualitative analyses and have a particular interest in this area of research and have previously published on the topic of OTC/POM misuse (Gittins and Cole, 2021; Gittins et al, 2022a; Gittins et al, 2022b; Gittins et al ., 2022c). The lead researcher (RG) who is a female pharmacist and was previously unknown to the participants conducted the interviews and checked the transcripts to ensure completeness and anonymity; any contradictions to the key conclusions; any observations such as changes in intonation; and coded the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation