1999
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.134.4.381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of Patients With Melanoma and Histologically Negative Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
73
2
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(27 reference statements)
6
73
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, previous studies involving melanomas from all anatomic sites showed a statistically significant improvement in survival in patient with intermediate thickness melanomas (range, 1-4 mm), which suggests that some subgroups of patients may benefit from ELND 3,25,31 . Finally, despite the fact that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been adopted into clinical practice as reliable staging modality, there are lots of arguments against it, such as increased incidence of nodal (regional and in-transit) recurrence in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) negative patients, possibility of false-negative results, difficult identification of SLN if they are located close to primary site, SLN found in multiple node fields in contrast to melanomas located on extremities which usually drain to only 1 field, SLN in parotid region which are often very small, may be difficult to find, and their removal may put the facial nerve at risk 8,10,12,15,16,29,36,37 . However, some authors reported that intraparotid SLN biopsy is a reliable, accurate, and safe procedure for staging cutaneous head and neck melanoma 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, previous studies involving melanomas from all anatomic sites showed a statistically significant improvement in survival in patient with intermediate thickness melanomas (range, 1-4 mm), which suggests that some subgroups of patients may benefit from ELND 3,25,31 . Finally, despite the fact that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been adopted into clinical practice as reliable staging modality, there are lots of arguments against it, such as increased incidence of nodal (regional and in-transit) recurrence in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) negative patients, possibility of false-negative results, difficult identification of SLN if they are located close to primary site, SLN found in multiple node fields in contrast to melanomas located on extremities which usually drain to only 1 field, SLN in parotid region which are often very small, may be difficult to find, and their removal may put the facial nerve at risk 8,10,12,15,16,29,36,37 . However, some authors reported that intraparotid SLN biopsy is a reliable, accurate, and safe procedure for staging cutaneous head and neck melanoma 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With long-term follow-up of patients with negative sentinel nodes there is a small but definite incidence of recurrence in the mapped and sampled nodal basin. 5,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] These patients may be considered to have a false-negative result of their sentinel node biopsy procedure. Previous reports have suggested that the majority of patients who recur in the relevant node field will, in fact, have identifiable metastases in the biopsied sentinel node if a more comprehensive histopathologic evaluation of the node is undertaken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With long-term follow-up of patients with negative sentinel nodes, some develop a recurrence in the mapped and sampled nodal basin and these patients may be considered to have a false-negative result of their sentinel node biopsy procedure. A technique to confirm true sentinel node identity may reduce the false-negative rate of the procedure, which has been disappointingly high (up to 44%) in several recently reported studies, 5,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] or at least provide a retrospective explanation for a falsenegative result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominant treatment for primary melanoma is wide local excision; however, even patients treated with surgical resection are at a high risk of nodal and distant metastases [11,37]. In addition, MM is generally resistant to conventional therapies such as systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy [5]; therefore, MM carries a poor prognosis [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%