2017
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of isolated enlarged cisterna magna identified in utero: experience at a single medical center in mainland China

Abstract: The outcome of children with IECM may be guarded, especially some subtle deficits in adapting and gross motor abilities. In contrast, the developmental quotients of infants with prenatal non-IECM were lower than that those of normal infants. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a systemic review of isolated prenatal posterior fossa malformations, the rates of additional CNS and other system anomalies were found as 12.6% and 16.6%, respectively (17). Furthermore, isolated MCM has a favorable outcome (18). The differential diagnosis of posterior fossa enlargement is another challenging subject in prenatal diagnosis and MCM, Blake’s pouch cyst and vermian hypoplasia may all cause similar US findings (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a systemic review of isolated prenatal posterior fossa malformations, the rates of additional CNS and other system anomalies were found as 12.6% and 16.6%, respectively (17). Furthermore, isolated MCM has a favorable outcome (18). The differential diagnosis of posterior fossa enlargement is another challenging subject in prenatal diagnosis and MCM, Blake’s pouch cyst and vermian hypoplasia may all cause similar US findings (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic yields of CMA over NIPT and karyotyping varied greatly between the reviewed studies, from 0 in three of these studies involving fetuses with other USMs rather than MVM 19,20,26 to 9.64% in fetuses with MVM in our prospective cohort study (Table 4). These discrepancies could be partially explained by the small sample sizes involved, by differences in cohort selection, and especially by the involvement of fetuses with different USMs.…”
Section: Results Of Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The search revealed 799 studies, of which 9 studies in addition to our own study met the final inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis (Figure 1). [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Quality assessment of the included studies using QUADAS-2 was shown in Figure S1 of Supporting Information. Overall, 1817 fetuses were involved in this meta-analysis, including 405 fetuses with MVM and 1412 fetuses with other USMs (Table S3 of Supporting Information).…”
Section: Results Of Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 804 studies were initially screened and 59 publications were included in the final systematic review 4,5,7,15‐69 (Figure 1) (Table S1). Separate publications with duplicated data from those included were assessed 51,70‐80 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%