2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of heroin-dependent adolescents presenting for opiate substitution treatment

Abstract: Because the outcome of methadone and buprenorphine substitution treatment in adolescents is unclear, we completed a retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive heroin-dependent adolescents who sought these treatments over an 8-year recruitment period. The participants' average age was 16.6 years, and 54 were female. Half of the patient group remained in treatment for over 1 year. Among those still in treatment at 12 months, 39% demonstrated abstinence from heroin. The final route of departure from the treatm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, abstinence from illicit opiates in this group was very low, as shown by the exceptionally high proportion of participants (80.6%) testing positive compared with other longer-term treatment programmes. [21][22] While this may reflect international experience that longer periods than the SBRC's 12-week programme are necessary for higher abstinence, a possible reason for the low rate could be the high rate (54.8%) of concomitant use of other potentially destabilising drugs, which often leads to impulsive use of heroin during rehabilitation. [17] In addition, so that more participants could be included in a setting where funding was limited, a lower dose of the opiate analogue was used (median 4 mg) than that required to suppress illicit opioid use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, abstinence from illicit opiates in this group was very low, as shown by the exceptionally high proportion of participants (80.6%) testing positive compared with other longer-term treatment programmes. [21][22] While this may reflect international experience that longer periods than the SBRC's 12-week programme are necessary for higher abstinence, a possible reason for the low rate could be the high rate (54.8%) of concomitant use of other potentially destabilising drugs, which often leads to impulsive use of heroin during rehabilitation. [17] In addition, so that more participants could be included in a setting where funding was limited, a lower dose of the opiate analogue was used (median 4 mg) than that required to suppress illicit opioid use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attrition and dropout seem to be important factors hindering to maximize treatment outcome in opioid dependent youth (Warden et al, 2012;Bell & Mutch, 2006;Burns et al, 2009;Marsch et al, 2005;Woody et al, 2008;Smyth et al, 2012;Matson et al, 2014). However, retention and abstinence during buprenorphine treatment have been associated with better outcomes in youth (Subramaniam et al, 2011;Woody et al, 2008;Matson et al, 2014) and adults (Armstrong et al, 2010;Mintzer et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, retention in treatment of opioid dependence was investigated mostly in adults, with studies lasting 6 months (O'Connor et al, 1996;Fiellin et al, 2006;Armstrong et al, 2010) and those lasting 18 months or more (Fiellin et al, 2008;Parran et al, 2010). In youths, BUP/NAL treatment outcomes including retention were less examined in short-term (Marsch et al, 2005;Woody et al, 2008) and long-term (Smyth et al, 2012;Matson et al, 2014) studies conducted in outpatient settings. It is not known whether inpatient admissions impact the outcomes of BUP/NAL treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies report drop-out rates ranging from 21.5-43% in detoxification [89,90] outpatient treatment 23-50% [91,92], inpatient treatment 17-57% [93] and substitution treatment 32-67.7% [94,95]. A meta-analysis of psychotherapy found a dropout rate between 19 and 47% [96].…”
Section: Positive Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%