Outcome indicators in palliative care—how to assess quality and success. Focus group and nominal group technique in Germany

Abstract

PurposeThe call for clinically relevant outcome criteria has been raised, as assessment of adequate quality of service providers is essential with increasing momentum in the development of palliative care in most European countries. The aim of this study is to investigate important dimensions and indicators for assessment and evaluation of palliative care from the perspective of multi-disciplinary German experts working over years in the field of palliative care.MethodsA focus group, using the structured consensus method of the improved nominal group technique (INGT), with nine experts from different disciplines was conducted in Germany.ResultsAn abundance of topics (16) were identified, pointing at the complexity of the issue. Main topics were: quality of life, needs assessments of patients and relatives, resource assessment, surveillance of decision-making processes, as well as spiritual well-being. The following properties were claimed as essential for outcome criteria sensitivity, without additional burden on patients, easy applicability, scientific validity, and helpful for communication within the team, ethical discussions as well as for quality management.ConclusionsThe study identified topics considered important by experts in clinical practise. The discussions exposed the diversity of demands on outcome assessment put up by different stakeholder groups. This and the high number of relevant items show the complexity for the agreement on a unique set of outcome criteria. Further research considering other perspectives is needed.

Palliative care quality indicators in Italy. What do we evaluate?

“…Methodological instruments for the identification of other types of outcome are not mentioned. Our analysis confirms the need, already described in international literature [5,9,11,20,21], to develop and implement outcome indicators.…”

Enhancing patient-reported outcome measurement in research and practice of palliative and end-of-life care

“…Regardless, EOL care providers must prove the quality of their care and, therefore, need valid and reliable measures. Also, PROMs play an important role for the use of quality indicators in EOL care in order to monitor and improve care [10]. The African participant reported about the enthusiasm, commitment, and success when incorporating a new PROM in clinical practice in Africa.…”

Nominal group technique: An effective method for obtaining group consensus

“…The final two compelling reasons for using NGT in this study were its capacity to give equal representation to all group members and to create an environment conducive to initiation of change 31 . These are key considerations from a critical action researcher's perspective.…”

“…Ideal group size is usually 6-12 people. 31 Secondly, NGT is money efficient 30 in that it entails little direct expenditure. In this case, the venue was available without charge, and a small grant enabled refreshments to be provided, which appeared to encourage a relaxed and sharing atmosphere.…”