2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172x.2012.02017.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nominal group technique: An effective method for obtaining group consensus

Abstract: This paper aims to demonstrate the versatility and application of nominal group technique as a method for generating priority information. Nominal group technique was used in the context of four focus groups involving clinical experts from the emergency department (ED) and obstetric and midwifery areas of a busy regional hospital to assess the triage and management of pregnant women in the ED. The data generated was used to create a priority list of discussion triggers for the subsequent Participatory Action R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
470
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 526 publications
(514 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
470
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, proposed data sets need to be validated. Again, a number of approaches are possible, most of which involve review by additional groups of experts and stakeholders, with methods such as the Nominal Group Technique 24 used to reach consensus on the applicability of items in data sets. The development of a formal global MDS for smoking cessation will need to follow these lines, using robust methods to identify and validate data sets, with particular attention given to testing of cross‐cultural aspects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, proposed data sets need to be validated. Again, a number of approaches are possible, most of which involve review by additional groups of experts and stakeholders, with methods such as the Nominal Group Technique 24 used to reach consensus on the applicability of items in data sets. The development of a formal global MDS for smoking cessation will need to follow these lines, using robust methods to identify and validate data sets, with particular attention given to testing of cross‐cultural aspects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NGT meetings are structured to effectively minimize the process loss that occurs when group participants directly interact, which often occurs with brainstorming and focus groups (26). This structure promotes even rates of participation and equally weights the input from all participants, and as such, the anonymously ranked responses provide a valid reflection of the collective views held by group participants (27).…”
Section: Ngtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consensus methods will be used to identify how the intervention programme and resources required to support the implementation process can be refined. A modified nominal group technique using the following steps will be followed in the workshop: Introduction and explanation; Silent generation of ideas; Sharing ideas-Round robin; Group discussion/clarifying and Ranking 43 .…”
Section: Nch Staff Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%