2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.374101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy, Propertization, and Gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the somewhat fanciful argument advanced by some commentators that the individual choices about the persona might constitute creative expression within the subject matter of copyright (Bartow 2000), personal facts are unlikely to constitute a compilation for purposes of copyright. Even very complex distinctive features of an individual, such as facial features, are unlikely to be considered creative expression for purposes of copyright.…”
Section: The Law Of Data Representationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite the somewhat fanciful argument advanced by some commentators that the individual choices about the persona might constitute creative expression within the subject matter of copyright (Bartow 2000), personal facts are unlikely to constitute a compilation for purposes of copyright. Even very complex distinctive features of an individual, such as facial features, are unlikely to be considered creative expression for purposes of copyright.…”
Section: The Law Of Data Representationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One implication related to data dispossession is "technological redlining"-the power of digital decisions made by algorithms to reinforce oppressive social relationships and enact new modes of racial profiling (Noble, 2018). Tracing this concept back, "digital redlining" first emerged in the late 90s as speculation that data collected on us by way of the (then) future Internet may be used to both sell us things or deny us things, from jobs to housing (Bartow, 2000). Sure enough, this speculation on what was then termed "cyber-indicia" -digital information on a person's race, gender, or incomebecame a reality, a decision-making metric for those who could access this data.…”
Section: Racialized Dispossession and The Digitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be argued that the Internet has merely introduced us to a new vehicle for discrimination (Bartow, 2000; Maury and Kleiner, 2002). The presence of e‐lining and other electronic abuses allows for the creation of “virtual gated communities” (Netanel, 2000).…”
Section: Conclusion: E‐magining Ethics Among Netizensmentioning
confidence: 99%