2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-012-1018-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures without compression: key factors of diagnosis and initial outcome of treatment with cement augmentation

Abstract: The presence of previous or concomitant VFs leads to further imaging examination, which helps identify the occult VFs. Preoperative MRI examination especially T1 and STIR sequences plays a vital role in the early diagnosis of occult VFs. Except for significant pain relief and functional improvement, VP and KP can effectively prevent delayed vertebral collapse of occult VFs comparing to previous reported data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MSCT was also performed to study the vertebral structures before the PKP procedure. MRI was the most confirmative screening examination used to determine the presence of painful OOVFs; STIR sequences of MRI images show hyperintensity signal because of bone edema in the affected vertebra [18]. Patients with local infections, non-correctable coagulation disorders, and other systemic diseases were excluded from the treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MSCT was also performed to study the vertebral structures before the PKP procedure. MRI was the most confirmative screening examination used to determine the presence of painful OOVFs; STIR sequences of MRI images show hyperintensity signal because of bone edema in the affected vertebra [18]. Patients with local infections, non-correctable coagulation disorders, and other systemic diseases were excluded from the treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients highly suspected to have a fresh occult vertebral fracture, who have persistent pain and normal X-ray and CT images, should undergo additional radiologic tests, especially MRI. MRI is the most confirmative screening examination used to determine the presence of painful OOVFs; T2 and STIR sequences of MRI images show hyperintensity signal because of bone edema in the affected vertebra [18]. OOVFs are disabling causes of severe low back pain, requiring bed rest and increasing the risk of comorbidities [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most well recognized risk factor for adjacent fractures is cement leak into the disk space [6972]; osteoporosis [25, 69, 72] and kyphotic angle/degree of correction [25, 69] are also being implicated. In our practice, as suggested in the literature, to reduce the possibility of further fractures (especially when bony edema is found on the MRI at adjacent levels), we perform prophylactic augmentation [73, 74]. …”
Section: Subsequent Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on clinical practice, OVFs can be divided into three categories according to fracture symptoms and presence of vertebral deformation on plain radiographs: 1) painful OVFs, also known as fresh OVFs, refer to symptomatic fractures with loss of the vertebral height; 2) painless OVFs, also known as old OVFs, are asymptomatic fractures with vertebral collapse; and 3) occult OVFs, which imply painful vertebral fractures without radiographic measurable compression. [13] The diagnosis of painful occult OVFs is difficult due to the unapparent radiographic finding. Pham et al[11] reported that 21 cases of vertebral fractures in 16 patients were presented with a typical history of acute back pain in a setting of osteoporosis; however, there was no substantial deformation of the vertebral body at the initial plain radiographs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%