2018
DOI: 10.1002/oa.2700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteophageous insect damage on human bone from Je'reftheel, a Maya mortuary cave site in west‐central Belize

Abstract: Human bones from the Maya mortuary cave of Je'reftheel in west-central Belize show evidence of taphonomic modifications attributed to insects, with termites and dermestid beetles being the most likely culprits. This study represents the first detailed exploration of the effects of osteophageous insects on bones from the Maya area and thus expands on recent efforts by other researchers working in the region to document taphonomic processes and distinguish them from intentional mortuary treatments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although osteophagous beetle activity is well documented on human and animal bones from open sites, tombs, rock shelters or small mortuary caves (Britt et al ., 2008; Thompson et al ., 2018; Wrobel and Biggs, 2018), to date no cases have been reported from deep cave environments. The ichnology of bioerosion in the Bàsura bone assemblage requires further analyses that can allow us to describe the traces and to hypothesize the trace‐makers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although osteophagous beetle activity is well documented on human and animal bones from open sites, tombs, rock shelters or small mortuary caves (Britt et al ., 2008; Thompson et al ., 2018; Wrobel and Biggs, 2018), to date no cases have been reported from deep cave environments. The ichnology of bioerosion in the Bàsura bone assemblage requires further analyses that can allow us to describe the traces and to hypothesize the trace‐makers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing entomology literature about dermestids tends to discuss topics such as taxonomy (e.g., 2), necessary temperatures for development (e.g., 15,16), or artifact dermestids leave behind on animal bone after consuming soft tissue (e.g., 17,18). Literature about dermestids for a broader audience is generally focused on their use for processing nonhuman animal specimens (7,8,9,10,11,19), evidence of their activity from the archaeological or paleontological records (20,21,22,23,24,25), or evidence that they were present on human remains at a modern crime scene (3,26,27,28). Additionally, the available academic literature regarding the upkeep of dermestid colonies is either outdated or not specific regarding the methods necessary to maintain dermestids (e.g., 7,8,29).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that analysis of osteophagus insects had great importance in the interpretation of the bioarchaeological record since their damage could be misinterpreted either as cultural modifications or as pathologies [8,12,13]. Other studies emphasize the considerable contribution that insect activity plays in the site formation processes and the alteration or destruction of faunal remains [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%