2020
DOI: 10.1080/00914037.2020.1767619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteogenic differentiation of an osteoblast precursor cell line using composite PCL-gelatin-nHAp electrospun nanofiber mesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various synthetic functional polymers such as poly(glycerol sebacate), poly (3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxy valerate), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), and poly (ether urethane urea) are used to regenerate damaged skin tissue 136,137 . Many synthetic degradable polymers, specifically polylactides (PLAs) 138 and their copolymers with glycolide (PLGA), 139 polyethylene glycol (PEG), 140 and polycaprolactone (PCL) 14 are favorable materials for making degradable and functional nanofibrous skin tissue scaffolds. However, in most instances, synthetic polymers do not facilitate cellular attachment, proliferation, or infiltration in their pristine unmodified state 141 .…”
Section: In Vitro and In Vivo Advancements Of Nanofibers In Wound Healing Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Various synthetic functional polymers such as poly(glycerol sebacate), poly (3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxy valerate), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), and poly (ether urethane urea) are used to regenerate damaged skin tissue 136,137 . Many synthetic degradable polymers, specifically polylactides (PLAs) 138 and their copolymers with glycolide (PLGA), 139 polyethylene glycol (PEG), 140 and polycaprolactone (PCL) 14 are favorable materials for making degradable and functional nanofibrous skin tissue scaffolds. However, in most instances, synthetic polymers do not facilitate cellular attachment, proliferation, or infiltration in their pristine unmodified state 141 .…”
Section: In Vitro and In Vivo Advancements Of Nanofibers In Wound Healing Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrospinning is a viable process with high‐production capability for forming nonwoven fibrous scaffolds on the submicron‐nanometer scale due to its relatively easy and inexpensive setup. To achieve the desired properties of nanofibers, many precise electrospinning parameters can be configured as a scaffold for different cellular synergies 14 . Certain parameters, such as the molecular mass of the polymer and solution viscosity, solution flow rate, surface tension, and supplied voltage, as well as the distance between spinneret tip and collector plate, may influence the morphology of nanofibers.…”
Section: Electrospinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have found that PCL, PLA, and PLCL scaffolds support stem cell growth and osteogenic differentiation [9,14,22,35,36,38,40,41], whereas hyaluronic acid-based polymers mainly support the chondrogenesis of stem cells; however, this composite also induces MSC osteogenesis [12,42]. Some authors suggest that scaffolds composed of nanofibers are structurally similar to natural bone ECMs, and this membrane might provide a better environment for stem cell proliferation and os-teogenic differentiation [29,36,43]. Based on this observation and our results, we might conclude that PLCL is a better platform for hDPSC growth than HYAFF-11™ [22,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%