1971
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1971.00770070825007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ossicular Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
88
2
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
88
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Austin who classified ossicular chain defects in 1151 ears affected by CSOM, found incus erosion to be the most common type of ossicular defect [17]. However Sade et al and Jareen [8,11] found that both the malleus and incus could be equally affected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Austin who classified ossicular chain defects in 1151 ears affected by CSOM, found incus erosion to be the most common type of ossicular defect [17]. However Sade et al and Jareen [8,11] found that both the malleus and incus could be equally affected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained, as Udaipurwala et al have probably considered the lenticular process to be a part of the long process of incus, since they have not mentioned it separately [15]. Austin reported the most common ossicular defect to be the erosion of incus, with intact malleus and stapes, in 29.50% cases [16]. Kartush found erosion of long process of incus with an intact malleus handle and stapes superstructure (type A) as the most common ossicular defect [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Austin reported erosion of stapes at around 15.50% [16]. Sade et al reported stapes involvement in unsafe CSOM to be 36.00% [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, now most otologists favor Austin's classifi cation [3], which is based on remaining portion of the ossicular system to be reconstructed. It offers a more technical and functional method of describing the state of middle ear, the type of disease and the best choice of graft material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%