1990
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199012000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osseointegration of Titanium Implants in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Failure was defined as revision arthroplasty or radiographic evidence of femoral component loosening, indicated by an Engh fixation score ≤10 or an ARA score <2. Vertical femoral migration of >5 mm was defined as subsidence [15].…”
Section: Clinical and Radiological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure was defined as revision arthroplasty or radiographic evidence of femoral component loosening, indicated by an Engh fixation score ≤10 or an ARA score <2. Vertical femoral migration of >5 mm was defined as subsidence [15].…”
Section: Clinical and Radiological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An arthroplasty with different compounds may subsequently produce different wear particles that are metallic, ceramic and polymeric in nature. In general, it seems that: * polymers and ceramics give rise to fewer problems than metals (Pazaglia et al 1987); * the size and form of the particles play an important role: small or irregular particles are more active than larger or regular ones (Black 1988;Dorr et al 1990); * alloys containing Co-Cr-Ni raise more concern than Ti alloys (Sarmiento and Gruen 1985;McCutchen et al 1990). These differences are due to the physicochemical characteristics of alloys and their particles.…”
Section: Wear Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium implant, presenting itself simultaneously with excellent biocompatibility and mechanical properties, raises much interest as an alternative method of long-term fixation I- [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is generally described as osteoconductive. Furthermore, at the optical microscopic (OM) I- [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and the scanning electron microscopic (SEM) [15,16] level, the evidence of osseointegration [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]18], a direct bone-to-HAC contact, has been reported. However, at the SEM level, there are no quantitative studies on osteoconduction and osseointegration of HA-coated implant reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation