2019
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osseointegration of titanium dental implant under fluoride exposure in rabbits: Micro‐CT and histomorphometry study

Abstract: Objective: This study aims to investigate the influence of fluoride exposure on implant osseointegration.Methods: A total of 24 male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into the control group and the fluoride exposure group. Rabbits in the control group were fed with tap water, while those in the fluoride exposure group were given 200 mg/L sodium fluoride solution. After 2-month feeding, implants were inserted into the extraction socket immediately after extraction of rabbit mandibular anterior tee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have evaluated implant osseointegration using micro-CT imaging with encouraging results [31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have evaluated implant osseointegration using micro-CT imaging with encouraging results [31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal studies on rats' femurs are considered valid models for assessing implant osseointegration [29], usually measuring the parameter "bone-to-implant contact" (BIC) on histological images/sections [30]. The bone-implant interface can also be investigated with micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), which enables the 3D evaluation of the bone surrounding the implants and does not preclude further assessments afterwards [31][32][33][34][35]. This method overcomes the limits of histological analysis, such as the fact that a single histological section may not be representative of the bone apposition over the whole implant [36], and the fact that it is hard to obtain serial sectioning of bony specimens containing little metal implants positioned in small animals such as mice [37][38][39] and rats [40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical site was easily accessible through the conventional intraoral approach. There was minimal blood loss and low morbidity compared to other dental implant models as no extraction of primary teeth, lateralization of the inferior alveolar nerves or excessive bone removal were required [ 16 , 35 42 ]. The presented model was designed considering the three fundamental principles of animal research; replacement, reduction and refinement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many of these models the implants were placed in extraoral locations. Dental implants have been placed in the extraction sockets of the rabbit mandibular teeth by a handful of authors [ 16 , 37 , 39 42 ]. Munhoz et al in 2017 evaluated the impact of xenograft (Gen-Ox) on the osseointegration of dental implants after the extraction of the lower incisors bilaterally [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo experimental models especially rabbits and dogs have been used to simulate the oral implantation process and investigate the characteristics and the basic molecular mechanisms of osseointegration [15][16][17]. However, the complexity of metabolic and physical-chemical regulations of higher vertebrate makes it di cult to dissect the early phase of vascularized bone regeneration within a short period under zinc ions exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%