1995
DOI: 10.1086/176036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OSSE Observations of Gamma-Ray Emission from Centaurus A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
75
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this period, this source exhibited X-ray variability (Bond et al 1996) and also some soft γ-ray variability (Bond et al 1996;Kinzer et al 1995;Steinle et al 1998). However, Sreekumar et al (1999) found that the EGRET flux was stable during the whole period of CGRO observations.…”
Section: Cen Amentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this period, this source exhibited X-ray variability (Bond et al 1996) and also some soft γ-ray variability (Bond et al 1996;Kinzer et al 1995;Steinle et al 1998). However, Sreekumar et al (1999) found that the EGRET flux was stable during the whole period of CGRO observations.…”
Section: Cen Amentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The value of the folding energy of CenA is discussed extensively in the literature, with no clear consensus. For example, Rothschild et al (2006) measure a folding energy 1.5 MeV > using RXTE while at a similar luminosity, Kinzer et al (1995) find E 254 33 keV cut =  using CGRO/OSSE data. From the fluxes and spectral shape measured between 0.2 and 30 GeV with Fermi it is clear that the spectrum needs to roll over or break somewhere in the 100-1000 keV range (Abdo et al 2010b).…”
Section: Spectral Curvature At High Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed above, this effect is likely connected to the difference between a cutoffpl and a realistic Comptonization model: the cutoffpl model is constantly curving, even far below the folding energy, while a realistic Compton spectrum is much more power-law-like at energies significantly below the temperature of the Comptonization plasma and rolls over more steeply than the cutoffpl above it (see Figure 3 in Fabian et al 2015 and references therein). γ-ray instruments like INTEGRAL therefore detect the cutoff, but given their typically lower statistics at soft X-rays find an acceptable solution with a cutoffpl or a broken power-law model (Kinzer et al 1995;Beckmann et al 2011). For the X-ray instruments, on the other hand, the rollover is outside their energy range and they mainly measure the power-law part of the Comptonization spectrum, resulting in unconstrained or very high folding energies when using cutoffpl.…”
Section: Spectral Curvature At High Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adopting a power law with an exponential cutoff, the e-folding energy ranged from 300 to 700 keV depending on the brightness state of the source. The high-energy spectrum hardened with decreasing intensity (Kinzer et al 1995). Combining the data from all the CGRO instruments, OSSE, COMPTEL, and EGRET, Steinle et al (1998) showed that a further steepening of the spectrum occurs between the MeV (COMPTEL) and GeV (EGRET) energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%