2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/819/2/150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NuSTAR AND XMM-NEWTON OBSERVATIONS OF THE HARD X-RAY SPECTRUM OF CENTAURUS A

Abstract: We present simultaneous XMM-Newton and Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) observations spanning 3-78 keV of the nearest radio galaxy, CentaurusA (Cen A). The accretion geometry around the central engine in CenA is still debated, and we investigate possible configurations using detailed X-ray spectral modeling. NuSTAR imaged the central region of CenA with subarcminute resolution at X-ray energies above 10 keV for the first time, but found no evidence for an extended source or other off-nuclear p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
46
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
17
46
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In our sample, the strongest radio sources are Cyg A, 3C 382, Cen A, 3C 390.3, 3C 273, 4C 74.26, and 3C 120. However, in individual detailed analysis of these sources, we find our reflection fractions are consistent with those published in the literature using the same NuSTAR data sets, albeit sometimes slightly lower (e.g., Madsen et al 2015;Reynolds et al 2015;Fürst et al 2016). As theses studies test for the possibility of an additional jet component but do not find a significant contribution from one, we may be underestimating the reflection fraction in a few of these sources but not by a significant amount.…”
Section: The Nustar Reflection Fraction Samplesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In our sample, the strongest radio sources are Cyg A, 3C 382, Cen A, 3C 390.3, 3C 273, 4C 74.26, and 3C 120. However, in individual detailed analysis of these sources, we find our reflection fractions are consistent with those published in the literature using the same NuSTAR data sets, albeit sometimes slightly lower (e.g., Madsen et al 2015;Reynolds et al 2015;Fürst et al 2016). As theses studies test for the possibility of an additional jet component but do not find a significant contribution from one, we may be underestimating the reflection fraction in a few of these sources but not by a significant amount.…”
Section: The Nustar Reflection Fraction Samplesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The cutoffpl is continuously curving (even far below the folding energy) and does not necessarily accurately describe a Comptonization spectrum (Fürst et al 2016b;Fabian et al 2015). We therefore also tested the Comptonization model nthcomp (Zdziarski et al 1996;Życki et al 1999) and find a comparable fit with χ 2 red = 1.08 (χ 2 = 1022) for 945 d.o.f.…”
Section: Spectral Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2 -10 keV unabsorbed luminosity of the nucleus of Cen A is estimated to be as high as ∼ 5 × 10 41 ergs s −1 from Chandra and XMM-Newton, after correcting for the pile-up problem and adding extended emission (Evans et al 2004). Fürst et al (2016) use NuSTAR and XMM-Newton data and calculated an unabsorbed 3 -50 keV luminosity of 3.4 × 10 42 erg s −1 . The source is not resolved (the point-spread function of NuSTAR has a halfpower diameter of 60 ), but it can be argued that the jet is mainly visible in the soft X-rays and most of the high energy radiation is coming from the nucleus itself.…”
Section: Hcn/hcomentioning
confidence: 99%