1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1985.tb02765.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osmotically controlled‐delivery of metoprolol in man: in vivo performance of Oros systems with different durations of drug release.

Abstract: In vivo absorption from 19/190 and 19/285 metoprolol Oros drug delivery systems has been assessed by measuring plasma drug concentrations after single administration of the systems to six healthy volunteers. The initial in vitro release rate for both Oros preparations was 19 mg/h but they contained 190 or 285 mg of metoprolol fumarate. The plasma concentration‐time profiles for both Oros dosage forms were consistent with an extended duration of release and absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Analysis o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous studies (Godbillon et 1985) there was a delay in the onset c release from the Oros system probably the time required to achieve sufficien pressure within the core to initiate drug Corresponding lag phases were obser in vivo drug absorption profiles. How presence of similar but shorter dela: infusion profiles suggests some phy!…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…As in previous studies (Godbillon et 1985) there was a delay in the onset c release from the Oros system probably the time required to achieve sufficien pressure within the core to initiate drug Corresponding lag phases were obser in vivo drug absorption profiles. How presence of similar but shorter dela: infusion profiles suggests some phy!…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The amount of drug reaching the circulation after Oros was thus little altered by food, in contrast with the marked increase noted by for the conventional tablet. This discrepancy is probably Svensson et al, 1983), and its relationship to total absorption times for the conventional and Oros preparations (2.5 h and 14 h for 90% absorption, respectively; Godbillon et al, 1985).…”
Section: Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%