Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split‐mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance

Abstract

The results reveal that PISFOP and GCFOP may be measured by osmometer, and their levels may be related with the clinical conditions of periimplant/periodontal soft tissues.

Influence of restorative margins position on one‐stage laser‐microgrooved implants‐supported single screwed crowns: A clinical, biochemical, and microbiological analysis

“…Inflammatory and immune events were similar in the peri-implant mucosa and gingiva, and GCF and PISF production was governed by similar mechanisms, which depend on peri-implant tissue inflammatory conditions. 30 Furthermore, the volumes of the CGF and PISF appear to be directly related to the severity of the tissue inflammation, as they increase as a function of the greater vascular permeability and ulceration of the epithelium at inflamed sites. Cytokines like interleukin, IL-1β, IL-6, and the potential for inflammation is reduced adjacent to crown margins below the free gingival tissue.…”

“…In group A, the averages of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythensis were 2.6 x 10 3 (SD 0.9), 3.1 , PISF is an interstitial fluid that appears in the sulcus because of an osmotic gradient. 17,30 Several clinical studies, 17,[30][31][32] comparing the inflammatory and immunological responses around implants and teeth found no significant difference between PISF and GCF volumes at either healthy or inflamed sites. Inflammatory and immune events were similar in the peri-implant mucosa and gingiva, and GCF and PISF production was governed by similar mechanisms, which depend on peri-implant tissue inflammatory conditions.…”

“…Several clinical studies, comparing the inflammatory and immunological responses around implants and teeth found no significant difference between PISF and GCF volumes at either healthy or inflamed sites. Inflammatory and immune events were similar in the peri‐implant mucosa and gingiva, and GCF and PISF production was governed by similar mechanisms, which depend on peri‐implant tissue inflammatory conditions . Furthermore, the volumes of the CGF and PISF appear to be directly related to the severity of the tissue inflammation, as they increase as a function of the greater vascular permeability and ulceration of the epithelium at inflamed sites.…”

“…In the present study, in addition to the clinical indices, the volume of PISF, and PISF levels of IL‐1β, IL‐6, and TNF‐α, were assessed. Similarly to gingival crevicular fluid (CGF), PISF is an interstitial fluid that appears in the sulcus because of an osmotic gradient . Several clinical studies, comparing the inflammatory and immunological responses around implants and teeth found no significant difference between PISF and GCF volumes at either healthy or inflamed sites.…”

Neurogenic inflammation in periimplant and periodontal disease: A case–control split‐mouth study

“…Although periodontal and periimplant tissues differ in regard to their developmental and the histological aspects, similar characteristics of these tissues have been well‐documented (Fujii et al, ; Lang & Berglundh, ; Quirynen, Herrera, Teughels, & Sanz, ; Sakallιoğlu, Lütfioğlu, Sakallιoğlu, Sert, & Ceylan, ; Yamaza et al, ). Thus, it has been proposed that the periimplant and periodontal tissues may exhibit similar defensive and inflammatory responses (Amaza et al, 2009; Fujii et al, ; Sakallιoğlu et al, ).…”