Harnack D, Ernst UA, Pawelzik KR. A model for attentional information routing through coherence predicts biased competition and multistable perception. J Neurophysiol 114: 1593-1605. First published June 24, 2015 doi:10.1152/jn.01038.2014.-Selective attention allows to focus on relevant information and to ignore distracting features of a visual scene. These principles of information processing are reflected in response properties of neurons in visual area V4: if a neuron is presented with two stimuli in its receptive field, and one is attended, it responds as if the nonattended stimulus was absent (biased competition). In addition, when the luminance of the two stimuli is temporally and independently varied, local field potentials are correlated with the modulation of the attended stimulus and not, or much less, correlated with the nonattended stimulus (information routing). To explain these results in one coherent framework, we present a two-layer spiking cortical network model with distancedependent lateral connectivity and converging feed-forward connections. With oscillations arising inherently from the network structure, our model reproduces both experimental observations. Hereby, lateral interactions and shifts of relative phases between sending and receiving layers (communication through coherence) are identified as the main mechanisms underlying both biased competition as well as selective routing. Exploring the parameter space, we show that the effects are robust and prevalent over a broad range of parameters. In addition, we identify the strength of lateral inhibition in the first model layer as crucial for determining the working regime of the system: increasing lateral inhibition allows a transition from a network configuration with mixed representations to one with bistable representations of the competing stimuli. The latter is discussed as a possible neural correlate of multistable perception phenomena such as binocular rivalry. biased competition; multistable perception; coherence; attention; routing IT IS A WIDESPREAD BELIEF that the brain has limited resources available for information processing (Marois and Ivanoff 2005). Selective attention provides a means of efficient and flexible operation under this restriction by allowing preferential allocation of processing resources to a particular area or feature in the visual scenery while ignoring distractors.Hints towards the mechanisms selective attention employs are provided by two seminal studies. By showing a preferred and a nonpreferred stimulus at separate spatial locations to a V4 neuron, Moran and Desimone (1985) discovered that presenting both at the same time results in an averaged rate between the rates the stimuli would elicit if presented alone. Attending one stimulus biased the response towards the rate the attended stimulus would evoke if presented alone (biased competition). These results suggest that attention selectively modulates the information flow through the visual hierarchy. Grothe et al. (2015) tested this hypothesis dire...